PMI-PBA Sample Questions Answers

The workflow trigger that the business analyst should incorporate is any change to the requirements matrix. This trigger would ensure that the appropriate stakeholders are notified of any updates, additions, deletions, or modifications to the requirements that affect the business analysis repository. Changes to test cases traced to requirements, change through project life cycle, and changes to stakeholder memberships are not relevant triggers for the notification workflow, as they do not directly affect the requirements matrix. References: PMI Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)® Examination Content Outline1, PMI Guide to Business Analysis2, Business Analysis for Practitioners: A Practice Guide

 A user survey is a technique that can be used to determine how well the solution meets the business case. A user survey is a method of collecting feedback from the end users of the solution about their satisfaction, preferences, expectations, needs, problems, or suggestions. A user survey can help to measure the performance, quality, usability, and value of the solution and compare it with the expected benefits and outcomes defined in the business case. A user survey can also help to identify areas for improvement or enhancement of the solution. Asking the sponsor for feedback is not sufficient to determine how well the solution meets the business case, as it does not capture the perspective of the end users who are directly affected by the solution. Surveying the project is not relevant to this scenario, as it does not focus on the solution but rather on the project management processes and practices. Comparing the results of day-in-the-life (DITL) testing and integration testing is not effective, as it does not reflect the actual usage and experience of the solution by the end users after deployment. References: PMI Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)® Examination Content Outline1, page 14; Business Analysis for Practitioners: A Practice Guide2, page 80.

According to the PMI Guide to Business Analysis, a data dictionary is a tool that defines and describes the data elements and their attributes in a consistent and standardized way. A data dictionary can help to minimize the risk of misunderstanding or misinterpreting data items mentioned in the requirements documents, as it provides a common language and reference for all stakeholders involved in the project. A data dictionary can also help to ensure the quality, accuracy, and completeness of the data requirements. Planning a peer review, asking for a formal acceptance, or holding a workshop are other ways to improve the clarity and understanding of the requirements specification, but they do not address the specific issue of defining and describing the data items. References: PMI Guide to Business Analysis, page 169-170.

 A survey is a technique to collect information, opinions, or feedback from a large number of stakeholders, such as customers or users. A survey can help to measure the current level of customer satisfaction and loyalty, and to identify the needs and expectations of the customers for the tool. A survey can provide a basis for analyzing vendor products by comparing their features, benefits, and costs with the customer requirements. The other options are not suitable for this purpose. A storyboard is a technique to visualize the user interface or user experience of a solution using sketches or mockups. A project charter is a document that authorizes the project and defines its objectives, scope, and stakeholders. A business case is a document that provides the justification for initiating a project based on its expected benefits, costs, and risks. References: PMI-PBA® Examination Content Outline, page 11; PMI-PBA® Reference List, page 1, BABOK® Guide v3, page 50.

A fishbone diagram, also known as a cause-and-effect diagram or an Ishikawa diagram, is a tool that helps to identify and analyze the possible causes of a problem or an effect. It can help the business analyst to perform a root cause analysis in order to analyze and resolve the discrepancy identified through user acceptance testing. A fishbone diagram has a structure that resembles a fish skeleton, with a head, a spine, and several branches. The head represents the problem or the effect, the spine represents the main cause categories, and the branches represent the sub-causes or factors that contribute to the problem or the effect. By creating a fishbone diagram, the business analyst can brainstorm and organize the potential causes of the software flaw, and then investigate and verify the most likely root cause. A fishbone diagram can also help to communicate the findings and recommendations to the stakeholders and the development team. An interface analysis is a tool that helps to identify and describe the interactions and dependencies between different components or systems. It does not help to perform a root cause analysis in order to analyze and resolve the discrepancy identified through user acceptance testing, as it does not focus on the causes and effects of the problem. A Delphi estimation is a tool that helps to obtain a consensus among a group of experts on a complex or uncertain issue. It does not help to perform a root cause analysis in order to analyze and resolve the discrepancy identified through user acceptance testing, as it does not provide a systematic and structured way to identify and analyze the causes of the problem. A functional decomposition is a tool that helps to break down a complex system or process into smaller and simpler components or functions. It does not help to perform a root cause analysis in order to analyze and resolve the discrepancy identified through user acceptance testing, as it does not show the relationships and influences between the components or functions. References: PMI Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)® Examination Content Outline1, PMI Guide to Business Analysis2, Business Analysis for Practitioners: A Practice Guide3, Root Cause Analysis: Definition, Examples & Methods | Tableau1

 A change-driven approach is the approach that best aligns with the business need for an organization that prefers taking an exploratory approach to finding the solution that best meets the business need. A change-driven approach is an adaptive and iterative approach that embraces changes and feedback throughout the project lifecycle. It allows the organization to explore different options and alternatives for the solution and deliver value incrementally and frequently. A change-driven approach is suitable for projects that have high uncertainty, complexity, or volatility in the requirements or the environment. A plan-driven approach is not the approach that best aligns with the business need for an organization that prefers taking an exploratory approach to finding the solution that best meets the business need. A plan-driven approach is a predictive and sequential approach that follows a detailed plan and minimizes changes and deviations from the baseline. It requires the organization to have a clear and stable vision of the solution and deliver value at the end of the project. A plan-driven approach is suitable for projects that have low uncertainty, complexity, or volatility in the requirements or the environment. A waterfall approach is not the approach that best aligns with the business need for an organization that prefers taking an exploratory approach to finding the solution that best meets the business need. A waterfall approach is a type of plan-driven approach that divides the project into distinct phases and completes each phase before moving to the next one. It does not allow for any changes or revisions once a phase is completed. A waterfall approach is suitable for projects that have very simple, well-defined, and fixed requirements and solutions. An analytical approach is not the approach that best aligns with the business need for an organization that prefers taking an exploratory approach to finding the solution that best meets the business need. An analytical approach is a technique or a method for solving problems or making decisions based on data, logic, and reasoning. It does not refer to a specific project management or business analysis approach. References: Business Analysis for Practitioners: A Practice Guide 1, page 28-29; PMI Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)® Examination Content Outline 2, page 13.

According to the PMI Professional in Business Analysis objectives and content, a prototype is a tool that can be used to elicit, analyze, and validate requirements. A prototype is a representation of a solution that allows stakeholders to interact with it and provide feedback. By developing a prototype, the business analyst can gather functional requirements from the end user and ensure that the new interface supports their core business processes. A prototype can also help to reduce ambiguity, resolve conflicts, and increase stakeholder satisfaction. References:

PMI Professional in Business Analysis objectives and content: PMI-PBA Certification

PMI Professional in Business Analysis reference list: PBA Reference List

PMI Professional in Business Analysis study guide: PMI.com

Quality assurance is a function that involves applying quality standards and processes to ensure that the project or program meets the quality requirements and delivers the expected value to the stakeholders. Quality assurance also involves auditing the quality requirements and the results of quality control measurements to ensure that appropriate quality standards and operational definitions are being used. Quality assurance helps to prevent defects and errors, improve customer satisfaction, and enhance the credibility and reputation of the organization. References: PMI Guide to Business Analysis, Chapter 10, Section 10.3.1; PMI Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA) ® Examination Content Outline, Domain V: Evaluation, Task 3.

To reduce the amount of time and effort needed to create a product specification for a project, the business analyst plans to reuse requirements. Requirements are statements that describe the needs, expectations, or capabilities of the stakeholders or the solution. Requirements can be reused from previous or similar projects, as long as they are relevant, consistent, and compatible with the current project context and objectives. Reusing requirements can help to save time and effort, avoid duplication or redundancy, leverage best practices, and ensure quality and compliance. Quantitative analysis is not something that the business analyst plans to reuse to reduce the amount of time and effort needed to create a product specification for a project. Quantitative analysis is a technique that involves using numerical data and methods to measure, compare, or evaluate the feasibility, value, or impact of a solution or an alternative. Quantitative analysis can be performed for different purposes and at different stages of the project, but it does not provide requirements for the product specification. Risk assessments are not something that the business analyst plans to reuse to reduce the amount of time and effort needed to create a product specification for a project. Risk assessments are techniques that involve identifying and analyzing potential threats or uncertainties that may affect the project or the solution. Risk assessments can help to prioritize, mitigate, or monitor risks, but they do not provide requirements for the product specification. Qualitative analysis is not something that the business analyst plans to reuse to reduce the amount of time and effort needed to create a product specification for a project. Qualitative analysis is a technique that involves using descriptive data and methods to understand, interpret, or evaluate the characteristics, behaviors, or perceptions of the stakeholders or the solution. Qualitative analysis can be performed for different purposes and at different stages of the project, but it does not provide requirements for the product specification. References: Business Analysis for Practitioners: A Practice Guide 1, page 114-115; PMI Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)® Examination Content Outline 2, page 17-18.

The business analyst should check the traceability matrix to identify affected use cases. A traceability matrix can help the business analyst to find out which use cases are related to the new set of regulations, and how they will impact the scope, schedule, cost, quality, and risk of the project. The business analyst should also communicate the changes to the relevant stakeholders, and update the requirements documentation and the business analysis plan accordingly. References: PMI Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)® Examination Content Outline1, page 20; Business Analysis for Practitioners: A Practice Guide2, page 100.

One benefit of documenting the change control process is that stakeholders know how to request changes. The change control process is a process that defines how changes to the project scope, schedule, cost, quality, or requirements are identified, evaluated, approved, implemented, and communicated. Documenting the change control process helps to establish clear and consistent guidelines and procedures for managing changes and ensuring that they are aligned with the project objectives and stakeholder expectations. Documenting the change control process also helps to inform the stakeholders about how to request changes, what information and justification are required, who is responsible for reviewing and approving changes, and what criteria and methods are used for assessing the impact and value of changes. Stakeholders are not shielded from how changes are assessed by documenting the change control process, as it implies that they are excluded or unaware of the change evaluation and decision making process. On the contrary, documenting the change control process helps to increase transparency, collaboration, and communication among the stakeholders regarding changes. Stakeholders do not have a schedule of changes to be deployed by documenting the change control process, as it implies that they have a predetermined or fixed plan of when and how changes will be implemented. On the contrary, documenting the change control process helps to ensure that changes are implemented in a timely and effective manner based on their priority, feasibility, and dependency. Stakeholders do not understand the difficulty of managing requirements by documenting the change control process, as it implies that they have a negative or pessimistic view of the requirements management process. On the contrary, documenting the change control process helps to improve the quality and stability of the requirements and reduce ambiguity, confusion, or conflicts among the stakeholders. References: Business Analysis for Practitioners: A Practice Guide 1, page 163-164; PMI Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)® Examination Content Outline 2, page 20.

 A change control process is a process that could help manage the situation of scope creep. Scope creep refers to the problem experienced on many projects when the size or complexity of the original product description grows. Scope creep can have negative impacts on the project schedule, budget, quality, and stakeholder satisfaction. A change control process is a process that defines how changes to the project scope, requirements, deliverables, or other configuration items are requested, evaluated, approved, implemented, and monitored. A change control process can help the business analyst and the project team to manage the expectations of the stakeholders, to assess the impact and feasibility of the changes, to prioritize and implement the changes, and to communicate the changes to the relevant parties. References: PMI Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)® Examination Content Outline1, page 23; Business Analysis for Practitioners: A Practice Guide2, page 131.

Decomposition model is a technique that involves breaking down a complex entity into smaller and more manageable components. Decomposition model can help the business analyst to estimate the effort associated with project requirements by providing a hierarchical structure of the requirements, showing the dependencies and relationships among them, and allowing for more accurate and detailed estimation at lower levels. References: = PMI Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)® Examination Content Outline (2019), page 13; Business Analysis for Practitioners: A Practice Guide (2015), page 71.

Persona analysis is a technique that involves creating fictional characters that represent different user groups within the company. Persona analysis can help the business analyst to evaluate the solution’s acceptance criteria by providing a detailed narrative of each user group’s needs, goals, preferences, and behaviors. Persona analysis can also help to prioritize the requirements and design features that best suit each user group. References: = PMI Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)® Examination Content Outline (2019), page 11; Business Analysis for Practitioners: A Practice Guide (2015), page 67.

According to the PMI Professional in Business Analysis objectives and content, an impact analysis is a technique that is used to assess the effects and implications of a change request on the requirements, scope, schedule, cost, quality, and other aspects of a project or product. An impact analysis can help to determine the feasibility, desirability, and priority of the change request, as well as to identify the risks, issues, and dependencies associated with the change. An impact analysis can also help to communicate the impact of the change to the stakeholders, and to support the decision-making process for approving or rejecting the change request. References:

PMI Professional in Business Analysis objectives and content: PMI-PBA Certification

PMI Professional in Business Analysis reference list: PBA Reference List

PMI Professional in Business Analysis study guide: Study.com

 A customer metrics tool is a tool that measures the satisfaction, loyalty, retention, and advocacy of customers. It helps to evaluate the performance and quality of the products or services offered by a company, as well as the effectiveness of the customer service and support. A customer metrics tool can also provide insights into the needs, preferences, expectations, and feedback of customers, which can help to improve the customer experience and increase customer retention and referrals. Some examples of customer metrics tools are12:

Customer Satisfaction Score (CSAT): This tool measures how satisfied customers are with a specific product, service, or interaction. It typically uses a scale of 1 to 5 or 1 to 10, where higher scores indicate higher satisfaction. CSAT can be used to assess the overall satisfaction of customers, or to focus on specific aspects, such as ease of use, quality, or speed.

Customer Effort Score (CES): This tool measures how easy or difficult it is for customers to complete a task, such as placing an order, resolving an issue, or finding information. It usually uses a scale of 1 to 7, where lower scores indicate lower effort. CES can be used to identify and eliminate the pain points and friction that customers encounter, and to enhance the customer experience and loyalty.

Net Promoter Score (NPS): This tool measures how likely customers are to recommend a product, service, or company to others. It uses a scale of 0 to 10, where customers are classified as detractors (0-6), passives (7-8), or promoters (9-10). NPS can be used to gauge the loyalty and advocacy of customers, and to calculate the growth potential and profitability of a company.

Churn Rate: This tool measures the percentage of customers who stop using a product or service within a given period of time. It can be calculated by dividing the number of customers who left by the total number of customers at the beginning of the period. Churn rate can be used to monitor the retention and attrition of customers, and to identify the reasons and factors that cause customers to leave.

Customer Lifetime Value (CLV): This tool measures the total revenue or profit that a customer generates for a company over their entire relationship. It can be calculated by multiplying the average purchase value by the average purchase frequency, and then multiplying the result by the average customer lifespan. CLV can be used to estimate the value and profitability of each customer, and to allocate resources and strategies accordingly.

A focus group is not a metrics tool, but rather a research method that involves a small group of customers who share their opinions and experiences about a product, service, or topic. A focus group can provide qualitative data and insights, but not quantitative measurements. A business completion metrics tool is a tool that measures the percentage of customers who complete a desired action, such as signing up, purchasing, or renewing. It can be used to evaluate the conversion and retention rates of customers, and to optimize the customer journey and funnel. A sales and marketing metrics tool is a tool that measures the performance and effectiveness of the sales and marketing activities and campaigns of a company. It can be used to track and analyze the sales and marketing goals, strategies, and outcomes, and to improve the sales and marketing efficiency and ROI. References: 1 The Top 5 Customer Satisfaction Metrics You Need to Track; 2 Customer Satisfaction Metrics: 7 Best Metrics to Measure

A review is a technique that involves examining a work product, such as requirements, to identify errors, omissions, inconsistencies, or ambiguities. A review can be formal or informal, depending on the level of rigor and documentation required. A review can be conducted by the business analyst alone or with other stakeholders, such as the project manager, the sponsor, the subject matter experts, or the end users. A review can be done through various methods, such as reading, walkthroughs, inspections, or peer reviews. The purpose of a review is to ensure that the requirements are clear, complete, correct, and consistent, and that they meet the quality standards and expectations of the stakeholders. By conducting a review, the business analyst can obtain approval from the stakeholders and confirm their agreement and commitment to the requirements. References: PMI Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)® Examination Content Outline1, page 23; Business Analysis for Practitioners: A Practice Guide2, page 131.

When a change request is received, the business analyst is responsible for analyzing the impact on business and underlying systems. The business analyst should assess how the change request will affect the business needs, objectives, and value, as well as the existing or planned systems, processes, and functions. The business analyst should also evaluate the feasibility, priority, and urgency of the change request, and provide recommendations and alternatives to the stakeholders. References: PMI Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)® Examination Content Outline1, page 23; Business Analysis for Practitioners: A Practice Guide2, page 132.

Internal rate of return (IRR) is a technique that calculates the annualized rate of return of an investment or a project. IRR can help the business analyst to determine the estimated growth rate of potential solution options by comparing the present value of the expected cash inflows and outflows of each option. IRR can also help to select the option that has the highest rate of return and exceeds the minimum required rate of return or the cost of capital. References: = PMI Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)® Examination Content Outline (2019), page 11; Business Analysis for Practitioners: A Practice Guide (2015), page 66.

Clear and unambiguous requirements are crucial for verification. Ambiguity can lead to misunderstandings and difficulty in assessing whether the product meets the specified needs during testing. References: PMI-PBA® Examination Content Outline, Business Analysis for Practitioners: A Practice Guide.

 According to the PMI Professional in Business Analysis objectives and content, one of the techniques to ensure consensus among stakeholders is to conduct a pre-review of the requirements with the key stakeholders before the formal review meeting. This can help to identify and resolve any issues, gaps, or conflicts that may arise during the meeting. A pre-review can also help to build trust and rapport with the stakeholders, and increase their confidence and commitment to the requirements. A pre-review can be done through interviews, workshops, surveys, or other methods of communication. References:

PMI Professional in Business Analysis objectives and content: PMI-PBA Certification

PMI Professional in Business Analysis reference list: PBA Reference List

PMI Professional in Business Analysis study guide: Study.com

A cost-benefit analysis is a tool or technique that compares the expected costs and benefits of a project or an investment. It helps to determine the value of a business case by estimating the net present value (NPV) of the project, which is the difference between the present value of the benefits and the present value of the costs. A positive NPV indicates that the project is worth pursuing, while a negative NPV suggests that the project should be rejected. A cost-benefit analysis can also calculate the return on investment (ROI) of the project, which is the ratio of the net benefits to the net costs. A higher ROI implies a higher value of the business case. A cost-benefit analysis can also consider the qualitative aspects of the project, such as the risks, assumptions, constraints, and opportunities12.

A variance analysis is a tool or technique that compares the actual performance of a project with the planned or expected performance. It helps to identify and explain the deviations or differences between the actual and planned results, such as costs, schedule, scope, quality, and benefits. A variance analysis can also provide corrective actions or recommendations to improve the project performance and align it with the business case13.

A SWOT analysis is a tool or technique that evaluates the strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats of a project, a business, or a situation. It helps to identify the internal and external factors that can affect the success or failure of the project or the business. A SWOT analysis can also provide strategies or actions to leverage the strengths and opportunities, and to overcome or mitigate the weaknesses and threats14.

A feasibility analysis is a tool or technique that assesses the viability and practicality of a project or a solution. It helps to determine if the project or the solution can be implemented within the available resources, time, budget, and technology. A feasibility analysis can also evaluate the potential benefits and risks of the project or the solution, and compare it with other alternatives15.

References: 1 PMI Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)® Examination Content Outline, page 10-11; 2 Business Analysis for Practitioners: A Practice Guide, page 123-124; 3 Business Analysis for Practitioners: A Practice Guide, page 125-126; 4 Business Analysis for Practitioners: A Practice Guide, page 127-128; 5 Business Analysis for Practitioners: A Practice Guide, page 129-130

Customer metrics on the existing system are an input into solution evaluation and decision making in this context, as they provide a baseline for measuring the performance and value of the new solution. The business analyst can use these metrics to compare the existing system with the new solution and assess how well the new solution meets the customer needs and expectations. A cost-benefit analysis of the existing system is not an input into solution evaluation and decision making, as it does not reflect the customer perspective or satisfaction with the system. Technical readiness of the development team is not an input into solution evaluation and decision making, as it does not relate to the quality or effectiveness of the new solution. A new solution design specification is not an input into solution evaluation and decision making, as it describes how the new solution will be built, not how it will perform or deliver value. References: Business Analysis for Practitioners: A Practice Guide, page 176-177; PMI Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)® Examination Content Outline, page 20.

The best practice in product validation is that the evaluation criteria should be the same as what was used to measure the requirement. Product validation is a process that confirms that the product meets the stakeholder needs and expectations and delivers value to them. Product validation involves testing and verifying the product against predefined criteria and standards that reflect the requirements. The evaluation criteria should be consistent with what was used to measure the requirement during analysis, as this ensures that there is no discrepancy or deviation between what was specified and what was delivered. The measurement of the requirement should not be based on the average of two or more evaluations, as this is not a best practice in product validation. Averaging two or more evaluations may result in inaccurate or misleading results, as it may mask or dilute any errors, defects, or variations in the product quality or performance. Averaging two or more evaluations may also introduce bias or subjectivity into the validation process, as different evaluators may have different methods, tools, or perspectives for measuring the product. There should not be two separate measurements for evaluating each functional requirement, as this is not a best practice in product validation. Having two separate measurements may create confusion or inconsistency in the validation process, as it may lead to conflicting or contradictory results, depending on how each measurement is defined, performed, or interpreted. Having two separate measurements may also increase complexity or redundancy in the validation process, as it may require more time, effort, or resources to conduct and compare each measurement. Two or more testers should not test the product using the same test cases so that their evaluations are consistent, as this is not a best practice in product validation. Having two or more testers use the same test cases may result in duplication or inefficiency in the validation process, as it may waste time, effort, or resources to perform identical tests without adding any value or information. Having two or more testers use the same test cases may also reduce effectiveness or reliability in the validation process, as it may overlook or ignore any errors, defects, or variations that are not covered by those test cases. References: Business Analysis for Practitioners: A Practice Guide 1, page 113-114; PMI Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)® Examination Content Outline 2, page 17-18.

 The business analyst must perform a cost-benefit analysis in order to complete the business case and arrive at a solid recommendation. A cost-benefit analysis is a technique that compares the costs and benefits of different options or alternatives for solving a business problem or achieving a business opportunity. A cost-benefit analysis helps to evaluate the return on investment (ROI), the net present value (NPV), and the payback period of each option, and to select the most optimal one based on the business value and the strategic alignment. References: PMI Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)® Examination Content Outline1, page 10; Business Analysis for Practitioners: A Practice Guide2, page 40.

According to the PMI Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)® Examination Content Outline, one of the tasks under the domain of Planning is to “Develop a risk management plan for business analysis activities and monitor risks, issues, and assumptions” (Task 9). This implies that the business analyst is responsible for identifying, analyzing, and managing the risks that may affect the business analysis activities and deliverables. If the risks are not addressed properly, they may result in deviations from the baseline budget, schedule, scope, or quality of the product. Therefore, the issue in this scenario could be that the risks identified in the risk management plan were not addressed properly.

 Gap analysis is a technique that contrasts the current and desired business views to analyze possible business changes. It identifies the gaps between the current state and the future state of the business and helps to prioritize the actions needed to close those gaps. Gap analysis can be used to assess the feasibility, scope, and value of a proposed change. References: = PMI Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)® Examination Content Outline (2019), page 10; Business Analysis for Practitioners: A Practice Guide (2015), page 52.

A modeling tool integrated into a version control feature that ensures that team knowledge is captured is a tool that should be used to improve the communication of product needs with the stakeholders and to improve their understanding. A modeling tool is a tool that allows the business analyst to create visual representations of the product needs, such as diagrams, charts, graphs, or mockups. These models can help the stakeholders to comprehend and verify the requirements more easily than textual descriptions. A version control feature is a tool that allows the business analyst to track and manage changes to the models and ensure that they are consistent and accurate. A version control feature also enables collaboration and knowledge sharing among the team members and stakeholders. A requirements management tool that documents requirements and their properties and relationships is not a tool that should be used to improve the communication of product needs with the stakeholders and to improve their understanding, as it does not provide visual or graphical representations of the product needs. A document management system and a relationship matrix that groups all related documents is not a tool that should be used to improve the communication of product needs with the stakeholders and to improve their understanding, as it does not create or display models of the product needs. A workflow management tool that documents the flow of information is not a tool that should be used to improve the communication of product needs with the stakeholders and to improve their understanding, as it only focuses on one aspect of the product needs and does not capture other dimensions such as functionality, quality, or value. References: Business Analysis for Practitioners: A Practice Guide 1, page 77-78; PMI Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)® Examination Content Outline 2, page 16.

 A RACI matrix is a tool that defines the roles and responsibilities of stakeholders in a project or a process. It clarifies who is Responsible, Accountable, Consulted, and Informed for each task or deliverable. The business analyst should refer to the RACI matrix to identify who is responsible for signoff, as this person has the authority and accountability to approve the solution and its testing results. Contacting the sponsor, the stakeholder who provided the majority of requirements, or the project manager may not be appropriate, as they may not be the designated person for signoff according to the RACI matrix. No signoff is necessary is incorrect, as signoff is an important step to confirm that the solution meets the requirements and acceptance criteria. References: PMI Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)® Examination Content Outline1, page 13; Business Analysis for Practitioners: A Practice Guide2, page 77.

 This situation could have been avoided if a change control process for requirements and their statuses was followed. A change control process is a set of procedures and tools that helps the business analyst to manage changes to the requirements, and to document and communicate the impact and approval of the changes. A change control process also helps to maintain the traceability and quality of the requirements, and to ensure that they are aligned with the business needs and the project scope. References: PMI Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)® Examination Content Outline1, page 23; Business Analysis for Practitioners: A Practice Guide2, page 131.

A SWOT analysis is a technique that helps to assess the internal and external factors that may affect the success of a solution or an option. A SWOT analysis involves identifying the strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats of each option, and comparing them with the business problem and the desired outcomes. A SWOT analysis can help the stakeholders to evaluate the feasibility, viability, and desirability of each option, and to select the best one based on the strategic alignment and the business value. References: PMI Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)® Examination Content Outline1, page 10; Business Analysis for Practitioners: A Practice Guide2, page 41.

 According to the PMI Professional in Business Analysis objectives and content, a vision/scope document is a document that describes the high-level vision, scope, and objectives of a project or initiative. It also defines the key stakeholders, business needs, expected benefits, assumptions, constraints, and risks. A vision/scope document can help to align the stakeholders’ views of organizational improvement with the project’s purpose and direction. It can also help to establish a common understanding and agreement among the stakeholders, and provide a basis for planning and prioritizing the requirements. References:

PMI Professional in Business Analysis objectives and content: PMI-PBA Certification

PMI Professional in Business Analysis reference list: PBA Reference List

PMI Professional in Business Analysis study guide: Study.com

A test case is a set of conditions or variables under which a tester will determine whether a system under test satisfies the requirements or works correctly. A test case is derived from the requirements and the acceptance criteria, and it specifies the input data, expected output, and execution steps. A test case is incorrect if it does not match the requirements or the acceptance criteria, or if it contains errors, ambiguities, or inconsistencies. If the business analyst receives a test result report that shows evidence of defective functionality, but verifies that the functionality behaves according to the requirements, the business analyst should first verify that the test case is incorrect. This can be done by reviewing the test case, comparing it with the requirements and the acceptance criteria, and identifying any discrepancies or flaws. By verifying that the test case is incorrect, the business analyst can avoid unnecessary changes to the requirements or the solution, and ensure that the test results are valid and reliable. References: PMI Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)® Examination Content Outline3, page 21; Business Analysis for Practitioners: A Practice Guide4, page 101.

Context diagrams are a technique that can be used to determine if requirements align to the product’s objectives. Context diagrams are a technique that involves creating a visual representation of the product and its interactions with its environment, such as other systems, processes, or stakeholders. Context diagrams can help to define and clarify the scope, boundaries, and interfaces of the product. Context diagrams can also help to verify that the requirements are consistent and compatible with the product’s objectives and value proposition. Five Whys is not a technique that can be used to determine if requirements align to the product’s objectives. Five Whys is a technique that involves asking a series of why questions to identify the root cause of a problem or an effect. Five Whys can help to understand and resolve the underlying issues or needs that drive the requirements, but it does not directly compare or evaluate the requirements against the product’s objectives. Activity network diagrams are not a technique that can be used to determine if requirements align to the product’s objectives. Activity network diagrams are a tool that involves creating a graphical representation of the sequence and dependencies of the activities or tasks in a project or a process. Activity network diagrams can help to plan and manage the schedule, resources, and risks of a project or a process, but they do not depict or assess the requirements or the product’s objectives. Business use cases are not a technique that can be used to determine if requirements align to the product’s objectives. Business use cases are a tool that involves describing and documenting how a stakeholder interacts with a system or a solution to achieve a specific goal or outcome. Business use cases can help to specify and communicate the functionality and behavior of a system or a solution, but they do not measure or validate the requirements or the product’s objectives. References: Business Analysis for Practitioners: A Practice Guide 1, page 78-79; PMI Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)® Examination Content Outline 2, page 16.

 A use case is a technique that describes how an actor interacts with a system to achieve a goal or perform a task. A use case consists of a main scenario and possible alternative scenarios that capture the normal, exceptional, and error flows of events. A use case can also include the acceptance criteria that specify the conditions that must be met for the use case to be successfully completed and accepted by the stakeholders. The test team can review the use cases to help identify the acceptance criteria for the solution, as they provide a comprehensive and realistic view of the expected behavior and outcomes of the system. The test team can also use the use cases to design and execute test cases that verify and validate the functional requirements and acceptance criteria of the solution. References: PMI Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)® Examination Content Outline1, page 20; Business Analysis for Practitioners: A Practice Guide2, page 99.

Communication is an essential part of requirements management, as it ensures that the requirements are clear, consistent, and agreed upon by all the project stakeholders. Stakeholders are the individuals or groups who have an interest or influence in the project, and who can provide input, feedback, and approval for the requirements. Communication also helps to avoid surprises, misunderstandings, and conflicts among the stakeholders, and to manage their expectations and satisfaction. Communication should be timely, accurate, relevant, and transparent, and should follow the communication plan and strategy defined in the requirements management plan12.

One of the aspects of communication is the status of the requirements, which indicates the progress and completion of the requirements throughout the project life cycle. The status of the requirements can be tracked and documented using a traceability matrix, which is a tool that links the requirements to their sources and traces them throughout the project. The status of the requirements can also be monitored and controlled using a change control process, which is a process that evaluates, approves, and implements any changes to the requirements. The status of the requirements can have different values, such as proposed, approved, implemented, verified, deferred, deleted, or rejected12.

When the status of a requirement changes, it should be communicated to all the project stakeholders, not just the source of the requirement or the project team. This is because the change in the status of a requirement may have an impact on the scope, schedule, cost, quality, or risk of the project, and may affect the interests or expectations of the stakeholders. Communicating the status of the requirements to all the project stakeholders helps to keep them informed and engaged, and to obtain their feedback and approval. It also helps to prevent surprises, such as the one experienced by the major stakeholder in the question, who was unaware that a particular requirement was deferred12.

Therefore, the best option is C. The status should have been communicated to all project stakeholders. Option A is not the best option, because the status should have been communicated to more than just the requirement’s source. Option B is not the best option, because the status should have been communicated earlier than prior to project launch. Option D is not the best option, because updating the status in the traceability matrix is not enough, as the stakeholders may not have access to or awareness of the matrix. References: 1 PMI Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)® Examination Content Outline, page 9-11; 2 Requirements Management 101 | Smartsheet 2

The decision-making process in the business analysis plan defines how decisions will be made regarding the requirements and the business analysis approach. It specifies the roles and responsibilities of the decision makers, the criteria and methods for making decisions, and the process for resolving conflicts and disagreements. Having a clear decision-making process can help the business analyst facilitate the requirements workshop and reach an agreement among the stakeholders with different points of view and priorities. References: = PMI Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)® Examination Content Outline, page 13.

The requirements sign-off is a process that involves obtaining the formal approval and acceptance of the requirements from the customer and other stakeholders. The requirements sign-off confirms that the requirements are clear, complete, correct, and consistent, and that they meet the customer’s needs and expectations. The requirements sign-off also establishes a baseline for the development and testing of the solution, and serves as a reference point for managing changes and resolving issues. The business analyst should first facilitate the requirements sign-off with the customer before the developers start development, to ensure that the requirements are agreed upon and validated by all parties, and to avoid rework, delays, and conflicts later in the project. References: PMI Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)® Examination Content Outline1, page 18; Business Analysis for Practitioners: A Practice Guide2, page 92.

Version control is a technique that helps to manage changes to requirements and ensure that only authorized changes are made. It also helps to maintain a history of requirements changes, which records the date, reason, and impact of each change. Tracking the status of each requirement helps to monitor the progress and completion of requirements throughout the project life cycle. These practices help to ensure the integrity of requirements and avoid confusion, inconsistency, or ambiguity. References: = PMI Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)® Examination Content Outline (2019), page 8; Business Analysis for Practitioners: A Practice Guide (2015), page 38.

According to the PMI Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)® Examination Content Outline, one of the tasks under the domain of Traceability and Monitoring is to “Track the status, priority, and disposition of requirements and issues, and communicate updates as necessary” (Task 1). This implies that the business analyst is responsible for ensuring that the requirements are delivered as stated and that any changes or issues are communicated to the relevant stakeholders. One of the techniques that can be used to perform this task is the traceability matrix, which is a table that shows the relationships between requirements and other project artifacts, such as design documents, test cases, or deliverables. A traceability matrix can help the business analyst to verify that all the requirements are covered by the test cases and that the test output matches the expected results. Therefore, the technique that the business analyst could have used to ensure that requirements were delivered as stated is the traceability matrix.

The business analyst would recommend formal signoff to the group if errors in the product could result in financial solvency. Formal signoff is a process that ensures that the stakeholders agree on and approve the requirements and deliverables of the project. Formal signoff can help to reduce ambiguity, confusion, or disputes among the stakeholders and increase their accountability and commitment to the project. Formal signoff is especially important when errors in the product could result in financial solvency, as it implies that there is a high level of risk, complexity, or regulation involved in the project and that any mistake or defect could have severe consequences for the organization or its customers. The industry being unregulated is not a reason to recommend formal signoff to the group, as it implies that there is less need for compliance or verification of the product quality or performance. The project impact being contained within a small department of the company is not a reason to recommend formal signoff to the group, as it implies that there is less stakeholder involvement or interest in the project outcome or value. The organization following an iterative project life cycle is not a reason to recommend formal signoff to the group, as it implies that there is more flexibility and adaptability in the project scope and deliverables and that feedback and validation are obtained frequently throughout the project. References: Business Analysis for Practitioners: A Practice Guide 1, page 113-114; PMI Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)® Examination Content Outline 2, page 17.

 A traceability matrix is a document that links requirements to their sources and traces them throughout the project life cycle. It helps to track changes in requirements, assess their impact, and ensure that they are met by the project deliverables. A traceability matrix is a useful tool for document control, as it records the version history of each requirement and the rationale for any changes. A statement of work, a project plan, and a problem or opportunity statement are not methods of document control, but rather documents that describe the project scope, objectives, activities, and justification. References: PMI Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)® Examination Content Outline, page 9 1; Business Analysis for Practitioners: A Practice Guide, page 121 2

 A requirements specification is a document that describes the customer’s needs for a product and includes a functional model, a data model, and a glossary of terms. A standard operating manual is a document that provides instructions on how to use a product or service. A business case is a document that justifies the initiation of a project or investment based on its expected benefits and costs. A project charter is a document that authorizes the start of a project and defines its scope, objectives, and stakeholders. References: = PMI Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)® Examination Content Outline (2019), page 8; Business Analysis for Practitioners: A Practice Guide (2015), page 36.

Requirements are statements of the needs, expectations, or conditions that must be met by a solution. Requirements should be clear, complete, consistent, and testable, so that they can be understood, verified, and validated by the stakeholders. If the requirements are not ready for peer review, it means that they have not met these quality criteria, and that they need to be refined or revised. One possible cause of this situation is that the requirements do not provide all of the information needed to define the work, such as the scope, objectives, deliverables, assumptions, constraints, risks, dependencies, etc. This would make it difficult for the peer reviewers to evaluate the feasibility, accuracy, and alignment of the requirements with the business needs and goals. The other options are not likely to cause this problem. Some requirements having not yet been discussed in a work group session is not a reason to delay the peer review, as long as the requirements have been elicited from the relevant sources and documented properly. The requirements’ reference codes not tracing to the attribute numbers in the work breakdown structure is a minor issue that can be easily fixed by updating the reference codes or the work breakdown structure. The requirements documents having not yet received sign-off from the sponsor is not a prerequisite for peer review, as sign-off is usually obtained after the peer review and validation process. References: PMI-PBA® Examination Content Outline, page 13; PMI-PBA® Reference List, page 1, BABOK® Guide v3, page 39.

 The project life cycle is a key factor that drives the selection of business analyst activities to be included in the project. The project life cycle is the sequence of phases or stages that the project goes through from initiation to closure. The project life cycle can be selected based on various factors, such as the nature, complexity, size, and uncertainty of the project, the stakeholder preferences, the organizational culture, and the industry standards. The project life cycle can influence the approach that the business analyst and the project team use to plan, execute, monitor, and control the project, and to deliver the product or service. The project life cycle can also affect the type, level, and timing of the business analysis activities, such as elicitation, analysis, documentation, validation, and management of the requirements. References: PMI Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)® Examination Content Outline1, page 15; Business Analysis for Practitioners: A Practice Guide2, page 84.

 Team peer review is a technique that is used to identify ambiguous or unverifiable requirements. Team peer review is a technique that involves having a group of peers or experts examine and evaluate the requirements for quality, completeness, correctness, clarity, consistency, and testability. Team peer review can help to identify any ambiguous or unverifiable requirements that may cause confusion, misunderstanding, or errors in the project. Team peer review can also provide feedback and suggestions for improvement or resolution of any issues or defects in the requirements. Fishbone analysis is not a technique that is used to identify ambiguous or unverifiable requirements. Fishbone analysis is a technique that is used to identify the root causes of a problem or an effect by analyzing its contributing factors and their relationships. Fishbone analysis can help to understand why a problem exists or why an effect occurs, but it does not directly examine or evaluate the quality of the requirements. Resource checklist is not a technique that is used to identify ambiguous or unverifiable requirements. Resource checklist is a tool that is used to identify and document the resources needed to perform business analysis activities, such as people, tools, facilities, equipment, etc. Resource checklist can help to plan and manage the resources required for business analysis work, but it does not assess or verify the quality of the requirements. Traceability matrix is not a technique that is used to identify ambiguous or unverifiable requirements. Traceability matrix is a tool that is used to track and document the relationships and dependencies among requirements and other project elements, such as design, test cases, risks, issues, etc. Traceability matrix can help to monitor and control changes to requirements and ensure alignment with project objectives and stakeholder needs, but it does not measure or validate the quality of the requirements. References: Business Analysis for Practitioners: A Practice Guide 1, page 162-163; PMI Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)® Examination Content Outline 2, page 19-20.

 Inspection is a technique or tool that is used to obtain acceptance of the delivered product. Inspection is a process that involves examining and measuring the product or its components against the predefined standards, criteria, or specifications, to determine its quality, completeness, and correctness. Inspection can help the business analyst and the project team to identify and correct any defects, errors, or deviations in the product, and to ensure that it meets the requirements and the stakeholder expectations. Inspection can also help to obtain the formal approval and acceptance of the product from the customer and other stakeholders, and to confirm that the product is ready for delivery or deployment. Inspection can be done using various methods, such as reviews, walkthroughs, audits, or tests. References: PMI Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)® Examination Content Outline1, page 21; Business Analysis for Practitioners: A Practice Guide2, page 101.

Time-boxing is a prioritization technique that involves allocating a fixed amount of time or resources to each requirement or backlog item. Time-boxing can help the business analyst to review the amount of work the team is capable of delivering based on the approved project schedule by setting deadlines and constraints for each requirement or backlog item. Time-boxing can also help to focus on the most valuable and feasible requirements or backlog items and avoid scope creep or gold plating. References: = PMI Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)® Examination Content Outline (2019), page 11; Business Analysis for Practitioners: A Practice Guide (2015), page 66.

 A force-field analysis is a tool that helps to identify and analyze the factors or forces that support or oppose a change or an initiative. It can help to facilitate the decision-making process when stakeholders do not agree on the value of an initiative by showing the pros and cons of the initiative, as well as the relative strength and importance of each factor. A force-field analysis can also help to develop strategies to increase the supporting forces or decrease the opposing forces, or both, to achieve the desired outcome. A PEST analysis is a tool that helps to examine the external factors that affect an organization or an initiative, such as political, economic, social, and technological factors. It does not help to facilitate the decision-making process when stakeholders do not agree on the value of an initiative, as it does not show the internal factors or the balance of forces. A feasibility analysis is a tool that helps to evaluate the viability and suitability of a project or an initiative, as well as the risks and benefits associated with it. It does not help to facilitate the decision-making process when stakeholders do not agree on the value of an initiative, as it does not show the supporting and opposing forces. A gap analysis is a tool that helps to compare the current state and the desired state of a process, a product, or a service, and identify the gaps or differences between them. It does not help to facilitate the decision-making process when stakeholders do not agree on the value of an initiative, as it does not show the factors or forces that influence the initiative. References: PMI Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)® Examination Content Outline1, PMI Guide to Business Analysis2, Business Analysis for Practitioners: A Practice Guide3, What is Force Field Analysis: Definition and Example

The business case is a document that provides the justification for initiating a project or program. It describes the business problem or opportunity, the benefits and costs of the proposed solution, and the risks and assumptions involved. The business case also includes the intangible costs and benefits associated with the change, such as the disruption and short-term loss of productivity that the client anticipates. The business analyst can use the business case to communicate the value proposition of the project or program to the stakeholders and decision makers. References: PMI Guide to Business Analysis, Chapter 3, Section 3.2.1; PMI Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)® Examination Content Outline, Domain II: Planning, Task 4.

The business analyst should explain the value of requirements traceability to the project sponsor. Requirements traceability is the process of tracking and documenting the relationships and dependencies among the requirements, the project deliverables, and the business objectives. Requirements traceability helps to ensure the quality, completeness, and alignment of the requirements, and to manage the changes, risks, and issues that may arise during the project. Requirements traceability also helps to measure the performance and the value of the solution, and to facilitate the verification and validation of the solution. References: PMI Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)® Examination Content Outline1, page 20; Business Analysis for Practitioners: A Practice Guide2, page 100.

The best approach to resolve this issue is to suggest re-estimating the requirement and following the change control process. This would allow the project team to assess the impact of the change request, evaluate the feasibility and cost of the modification, and obtain the approval of the stakeholders before implementing the change. A change control process is a method used to manage change requests for projects and big initiatives. It’s part of a change management plan, which defines the roles for managing change within a team or company1. Meeting with the customer and apologizing for misunderstanding the business’s need is not sufficient, as it does not address the root cause of the problem or propose a solution. Providing the stakeholder with a copy of the approved requirements baseline and moving forward without making a change is not acceptable, as it ignores the stakeholder’s feedback and dissatisfaction. Requiring development resources to work overtime to modify the deliverable to satisfy the stakeholder is not advisable, as it may compromise the quality of the work, increase the project cost and risk, and demoralize the team. References: PMI Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)® Examination Content Outline2, PMI Guide to Business Analysis3, Business Analysis for Practitioners: A Practice Guide4, What Is a Change Control Process? (with Example Change Log)

 A requirements traceability matrix is a tool that shows the relationship between each requirement and other project elements, such as objectives, deliverables, test cases, design components, etc. A requirements traceability matrix can help the business analyst to determine the impact for the specific requirement change by showing how the change affects other related requirements and project elements. A requirements traceability matrix can also help to assess the feasibility, scope, value, and risk of the change request. References: = PMI Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)® Examination Content Outline (2019), page 10; Business Analysis for Practitioners: A Practice Guide (2015), page 40.

 Time-boxing is a prioritization technique that involves assigning a fixed amount of time or resource to each requirement or deliverable, and delivering as much value as possible within that time or resource constraint. Time-boxing is useful when the project has a tight timeline or budget, and the stakeholders have too many requirements for the delivery window. Time-boxing helps to focus on the most important and valuable requirements, and to manage the expectations and scope of the stakeholders. References: PMI Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)® Examination Content Outline1, page 18; Business Analysis for Practitioners: A Practice Guide2, page 97.

One of the main purposes for creating a requirements traceability matrix is to track how requirements can be connected to the solution. A requirements traceability matrix is a tool that links the requirements to the project scope, objectives, deliverables, and test cases. A requirements traceability matrix can help the business analyst to track the origin, allocation, dependencies, and status of the requirements throughout the project lifecycle, and to ensure that the solution meets the requirements and the stakeholder expectations. A requirements traceability matrix can also help to manage changes, resolve issues, and measure the quality and performance of the solution. A requirements traceability matrix can be created using various formats, such as a table, a spreadsheet, or a database12. References: PMI Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)® Examination Content Outline3, page 18; Business Analysis for Practitioners: A Practice Guide4, page 92.

The next step that the business analyst should take after incorporating all the relevant feedback from stakeholders in the business analysis plan is to obtain approval on the plan. The business analysis plan is a document that describes how the business analysis activities will be performed, managed, and controlled throughout the project. It should be approved by the key stakeholders before the business analyst starts documenting or implementing the requirements. The approval process ensures that the stakeholders agree on the scope, approach, deliverables, roles, and responsibilities of the business analysis work. Starting documenting requirements without obtaining approval on the plan is not advisable, as it may lead to confusion, rework, or conflicts among the stakeholders. Storing the document for safe keeping is not a productive step, as it does not communicate or validate the plan with the stakeholders. Starting implementing the project without obtaining approval on the plan is not feasible, as it may result in wasted resources, missed expectations, or failed outcomes. References: Business Analysis for Practitioners: A Practice Guide 1, page 29-30; PMI Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)® Examination Content Outline 2, page 13.

 Prototyping is a technique that involves creating a simplified or partial version of the solution to elicit feedback from the stakeholders. Prototyping can help the business analyst to deal with a complex project with stakeholders who find it difficult to articulate their needs by providing a visual and interactive representation of the solution. Prototyping can also help to reduce requirements risk by validating or verifying the requirements, identifying gaps or errors, and resolving ambiguities or conflicts. References: = PMI Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)® Examination Content Outline (2019), page 12; Business Analysis for Practitioners: A Practice Guide (2015), page 69.