MLS-C01 Sample Questions Answers

 The solution A will meet the requirements with the least amount of effort from the internal team because it uses Amazon SageMaker Ground Truth and Amazon Rekognition Custom Labels, which are fully managed services that can provide the desired functionality. The solution A involves the following steps:

Set up a private workforce that consists of the internal team. Use the private workforce and the SageMaker Ground Truth active learning feature to label the data. Amazon SageMaker Ground Truth is a service that can create high-quality training datasets for machine learning by using human labelers. A private workforce is a group of labelers that the company can manage and control. The internal team can use the private workforce to label the satellite images as having solar panels or not. The SageMaker Ground Truth active learning feature can reduce the labeling effort by using a machine learning model to automatically label the easy examples and only send the difficult ones to the human labelers1.

Use Amazon Rekognition Custom Labels for model training and hosting. Amazon Rekognition Custom Labels is a service that can train and deploy custom machine learning models for image analysis. Amazon Rekognition Custom Labels can use the labeled data from SageMaker Ground Truth to train a model that can detect solar panels in satellite images. Amazon Rekognition Custom Labels can also host the model and provide an API endpoint for inference2.

The other options are not suitable because:

Option B: Setting up a private workforce that consists of the internal team, using the private workforce to label the data, and using Amazon Rekognition Custom Labels for model training and hosting will incur more effort from the internal team than using SageMaker Ground Truth active learning feature. The internal team will have to label all the images manually, without the assistance of the machine learning model that can automate some of the labeling tasks1.

Option C: Setting up a private workforce that consists of the internal team, using the private workforce and the SageMaker Ground Truth active learning feature to label the data, using the SageMaker Object Detection algorithm to train a model, and using SageMaker batch transform for inference will incur more operational overhead than using Amazon Rekognition Custom Labels. The company will have to manage the SageMaker training job, the model artifact, and the batch transform job. Moreover, SageMaker batch transform is not suitable for real-time inference, as it processes the data in batches and stores the results in Amazon S33.

Option D: Setting up a public workforce, using the public workforce to label the data, using the SageMaker Object Detection algorithm to train a model, and using SageMaker batch transform for inference will incur more operational overhead and cost than using a private workforce and Amazon Rekognition Custom Labels. A public workforce is a group of labelers from Amazon Mechanical Turk, a crowdsourcing marketplace. The company will have to pay the public workforce for each labeling task, and it may not have full control over the quality and security of the labeled data. The company will also have to manage the SageMaker training job, the model artifact, and the batch transform job, as explained in option C4.

References:

1: Amazon SageMaker Ground Truth

2: Amazon Rekognition Custom Labels

3: Amazon SageMaker Object Detection

4: Amazon Mechanical Turk

The correct combination of actions to enable the data scientist’s IAM user to invoke the SageMaker endpoint is B, C, and E, because they ensure that the IAM user has the necessary permissions, access, and syntax to query the ML model from Athena. These actions have the following benefits:

B: Including a policy statement for the IAM user that allows the sagemaker:InvokeEndpoint action grants the IAM user the permission to call the SageMaker Runtime InvokeEndpoint API, which is used to get inferences from the model hosted at the endpoint1.

C: Including an inline policy for the IAM user that allows SageMaker to read S3 objects enables the IAM user to access the data stored in S3, which is the source of the Athena queries2.

E: Including the SQL statement “USING EXTERNAL FUNCTION ml_function_name” in the Athena SQL query allows the IAM user to invoke the ML model as an external function from Athena, which is a feature that enables querying ML models from SQL statements3.

The other options are not correct or necessary, because they have the following drawbacks:

A: Attaching the AmazonAthenaFullAccess AWS managed policy to the user identity is not sufficient, because it does not grant the IAM user the permission to invoke the SageMaker endpoint, which is required to query the ML model4.

D: Including a policy statement for the IAM user that allows the IAM user to perform the sagemaker:GetRecord action is not relevant, because this action is used to retrieve a single record from a feature group, which is not the case in this scenario5.

F: Performing a user remapping in SageMaker to map the IAM user to another IAM user that is on the hosted endpoint is not applicable, because this feature is only available for multi-model endpoints, which are not used in this scenario.

References:

1: InvokeEndpoint - Amazon SageMaker

2: Querying Data in Amazon S3 from Amazon Athena - Amazon Athena

3: Querying machine learning models from Amazon Athena using Amazon SageMaker | AWS Machine Learning Blog

4: AmazonAthenaFullAccess - AWS Identity and Access Management

5: GetRecord - Amazon SageMaker Feature Store Runtime

: [Invoke a Multi-Model Endpoint - Amazon SageMaker]

Switching to an instance type that has a CPU: GPU ratio of 6:1 will reduce the training costs by using fewer CPUs and GPUs, while maintaining the same level of performance. The GPU idle time indicates that the CPU is not able to feed the GPU with enough data, so reducing the CPU: GPU ratio will balance the workload and improve the GPU utilization. A lower CPU: GPU ratio also means less overhead for inter-process communication and synchronization between the CPU and GPU processes. References:

Optimizing GPU utilization for AI/ML workloads on Amazon EC2

Analyze CPU vs. GPU Performance for AWS Machine Learning

The solution that will meet the requirements with the least amount of customization to transform and store the ingested data is to use Amazon Kinesis Data Analytics to read and aggregate the data hourly, transform the data and store it in Amazon S3 by using Amazon Kinesis Data Firehose. This solution leverages the built-in features of Kinesis Data Analytics to perform SQL queries on streaming data and generate hourly summaries. Kinesis Data Analytics can also output the transformed data to Kinesis Data Firehose, which can then deliver the data to S3 in a specified format and partitioning scheme. This solution does not require any custom code or additional infrastructure to process the data. The other solutions either require more customization (such as using Lambda or EMR) or do not meet the requirement of aggregating the data hourly (such as using Lambda to read the data from Kinesis Data Streams). References:

1: Boosting Resiliency with an ML-based Telemetry Analytics Architecture | AWS Architecture Blog

2: AWS Cloud Data Ingestion Patterns and Practices

3: IoT ingestion and Machine Learning analytics pipeline with AWS IoT …

4: AWS IoT Data Ingestion Simplified 101: The Complete Guide - Hevo Data

A stratified k-fold cross-validation strategy is a technique that preserves the class distribution in each fold. This is important for imbalanced datasets, such as the one in the question, where the disease is seen in only 3% of the population. If a random k-fold cross-validation strategy is used, some folds may have no positive cases or very few, which would lead to poor estimates of the model performance. A stratified k-fold cross-validation strategy ensures that each fold has the same proportion of positive and negative cases as the whole dataset, which makes the evaluation more reliable and robust. A k-fold cross-validation strategy with k=5 and 3 repeats is also a possible option, but it is more computationally expensive and may not be necessary if the stratification is done properly. An 80/20 stratified split between training and validation is another option, but it uses less data for training and validation than k-fold cross-validation, which may result in higher variance and lower accuracy of the estimates. References:

AWS Machine Learning Specialty Certification Exam Guide

AWS Machine Learning Training: Model Evaluation

How to Fix k-Fold Cross-Validation for Imbalanced Classification

Amazon Redshift ML enables in-database machine learning model creation and predictions, allowing data scientists to leverage Redshift for model training without needing to export data.

To create and run a model for customer churn prediction in Amazon Redshift ML:

Define the feature variables and target variable: Identify the columns to use as features (predictors) and the target variable (outcome) for the churn prediction model.

Create the model: Write a CREATE MODEL SQL statement, which trains the model using Amazon Redshift’s integration with Amazon SageMaker and stores the model directly in Redshift.

Run predictions: Use the SQL PREDICT function to generate predictions on new data directly within Redshift.

Options B, D, and E are not required as Redshift ML handles model creation and prediction without manual data export to Amazon S3 or additional Spectrum integration.

Amazon SageMaker is a fully managed service that enables developers and data scientists to quickly and easily build, train, and deploy machine learning models at any scale. SageMaker provides a variety of tools and frameworks to support the entire machine learning workflow, from data preparation to model deployment.

One of the tools that SageMaker offers is the Amazon SageMaker Python SDK, which is a high-level library that simplifies the interaction with SageMaker APIs and services. The SageMaker Python SDK allows you to write code in Python and use popular frameworks such as TensorFlow, PyTorch, MXNet, and more. You can use the SageMaker Python SDK to create and manage SageMaker resources such as notebook instances, training jobs, endpoints, and feature store.

If you need to continue working on a TensorFlow project using SageMaker for training without Wi-Fi access, the best approach is to download the TensorFlow Docker container used in SageMaker from GitHub to your local environment, and use the SageMaker Python SDK to test the code. This way, you can ensure that your code is compatible with the SageMaker environment and avoid any potential issues when you upload your code to SageMaker and start the training job. You can also use the same code to deploy your model to a SageMaker endpoint when you have Wi-Fi access again.

To download the TensorFlow Docker container used in SageMaker, you can visit the SageMaker Docker GitHub repository and follow the instructions to build the image locally. You can also use the SageMaker Studio Image Build CLI to automate the process of building and pushing the Docker image to Amazon Elastic Container Registry (Amazon ECR). To use the SageMaker Python SDK to test the code, you can install the SDK on your local machine by following the installation guide. You can also refer to the TensorFlow documentation for more details on how to use the SageMaker Python SDK with TensorFlow.

References:

SageMaker Docker GitHub repository

SageMaker Studio Image Build CLI

SageMaker Python SDK installation guide

SageMaker Python SDK TensorFlow documentation

The best way to handle the missing values in the patient age feature is to replace them with the mean or median value from the dataset. This is a common technique for imputing missing values that preserves the overall distribution of the data and avoids introducing bias or reducing the sample size. Dropping the records or the feature would result in losing valuable information and reducing the accuracy of the model. Using k-means clustering would not be appropriate for handling missing values in a single feature, as it is a method for grouping similar data points based on multiple features.

References:

Effective Strategies to Handle Missing Values in Data Analysis

How To Handle Missing Values In Machine Learning Data With Weka

How to handle missing values in Python - Machine Learning Plus

In predictive maintenance, when a dataset is imbalanced (with far fewer failure cases than non-failure cases), oversampling the minority class helps the model learn from the minority class effectively. The Synthetic Minority Oversampling Technique (SMOTE) generates synthetic samples for the minority class by creating data points between existing minority class instances. This can enhance the model’s ability to recognize failure patterns, particularly in imbalanced datasets.

SMOTE increases the effective presence of failure cases in the dataset, providing a balanced learning environment for the model. This is more effective than undersampling, which would risk losing important non-failure data.

Data augmentation is a technique to increase the size and diversity of the training data by applying random transformations such as rotation, translation, scaling, flipping, etc. This can help reduce overfitting and improve the generalization of the model. Data augmentation can be done using the Amazon SageMaker image classification algorithm, which supports various augmentation options such as horizontal_flip, vertical_flip, rotate, brightness, contrast, etc1

The Amazon SageMaker k-nearest neighbors (k-NN) algorithm is a supervised learning algorithm that can be used to label unlabeled data based on the similarity to the labeled data. The k-NN algorithm assigns a label to an unlabeled instance by finding the k closest labeled instances in the feature space and taking a majority vote among their labels. This can help increase the size and diversity of the training data and reduce overfitting. The k-NN algorithm can be used with the Amazon SageMaker image classification algorithm by extracting features from the images using a pre-trained model and then applying the k-NN algorithm on the feature vectors2

Using Amazon SageMaker Ground Truth to label the unlabeled images is not a good option because it is a manual and costly process that requires human annotators. Moreover, it does not address the issue of overfitting on the existing labeled data.

Using image preprocessing to transform the images into grayscale images is not a good option because it reduces the amount of information and variation in the images, which can degrade the performance of the model. Moreover, it does not address the issue of overfitting on the existing labeled data.

Replacing the activation of the last layer with a sigmoid is not a good option because it is not suitable for a multi-class classification problem. A sigmoid activation function outputs a value between 0 and 1, which can be interpreted as a probability of belonging to a single class. However, for a multi-class classification problem, the output should be a vector of probabilities that sum up to 1, which can be achieved by using a softmax activation function.

References:

1: Image classification algorithm - Amazon SageMaker

2: k-nearest neighbors (k-NN) algorithm - Amazon SageMaker

The solution A will create the required transformed records with the least operational overhead because it uses AWS Lambda and Amazon Kinesis Data Firehose, which are fully managed services that can provide the desired functionality. The solution A involves the following steps:

Create an AWS Lambda function that can transform the incoming records. AWS Lambda is a service that can run code without provisioning or managing servers. AWS Lambda can execute the transformation logic on the purchasing records and add the new attributes to the records1.

Enable data transformation on the ingestion Kinesis Data Firehose delivery stream. Use the Lambda function as the invocation target. Amazon Kinesis Data Firehose is a service that can capture, transform, and load streaming data into AWS data stores. Amazon Kinesis Data Firehose can enable data transformation and invoke the Lambda function to process the incoming records before delivering them to Amazon S3. This can reduce the operational overhead of managing the transformation process and the data storage2.

The other options are not suitable because:

Option B: Deploying an Amazon EMR cluster that runs Apache Spark and includes the transformation logic, using Amazon EventBridge (Amazon CloudWatch Events) to schedule an AWS Lambda function to launch the cluster each day and transform the records that accumulate in Amazon S3, and delivering the transformed records to Amazon S3 will incur more operational overhead than using AWS Lambda and Amazon Kinesis Data Firehose. The company will have to manage the Amazon EMR cluster, the Apache Spark application, the AWS Lambda function, and the Amazon EventBridge rule. Moreover, this solution will introduce a delay in the transformation process, as it will run only once a day3.

Option C: Deploying an Amazon S3 File Gateway in the stores, updating the in-store software to deliver data to the S3 File Gateway, and using a scheduled daily AWS Glue job to transform the data that the S3 File Gateway delivers to Amazon S3 will incur more operational overhead than using AWS Lambda and Amazon Kinesis Data Firehose. The company will have to manage the S3 File Gateway, the in-store software, and the AWS Glue job. Moreover, this solution will introduce a delay in the transformation process, as it will run only once a day4.

Option D: Launching a fleet of Amazon EC2 instances that include the transformation logic, configuring the EC2 instances with a daily cron job to transform the records that accumulate in Amazon S3, and delivering the transformed records to Amazon S3 will incur more operational overhead than using AWS Lambda and Amazon Kinesis Data Firehose. The company will have to manage the EC2 instances, the transformation code, and the cron job. Moreover, this solution will introduce a delay in the transformation process, as it will run only once a day5.

References:

1: AWS Lambda

2: Amazon Kinesis Data Firehose

3: Amazon EMR

4: Amazon S3 File Gateway

5: Amazon EC2

The best solution for this scenario is to use a multi-model endpoint in Amazon SageMaker, which allows hosting multiple models on the same endpoint and invoking them dynamically at runtime. This way, the company can reduce the operational overhead of managing multiple EC2 instances and model servers, and leverage the scalability, security, and performance of SageMaker hosting services. By using a multi-model endpoint, the company can also save on hosting costs by improving endpoint utilization and paying only for the models that are loaded in memory and the API calls that are made. To use a multi-model endpoint, the company needs to prepare a Docker container based on the open-source multi-model server, which is a framework-agnostic library that supports loading and serving multiple models from Amazon S3. The company can then create a multi-model endpoint in SageMaker, pointing to the S3 bucket containing all the models, and invoke the endpoint from the web client at runtime, specifying the TargetModel parameter according to the city of each request. This solution also enables the company to add or remove models from the S3 bucket without redeploying the endpoint, and to use different versions of the same model for different cities if needed. References:

Use Docker containers to build models

Host multiple models in one container behind one endpoint

Multi-model endpoints using Scikit Learn

Multi-model endpoints using XGBoost

The solution that will meet the requirements with the least amount of effort is to use a semantic segmentation algorithm to identify a visitor’s hair in video frames, and pass the identified hair to an ResNet-50 algorithm to determine hair style and hair color. This solution can leverage the existing Amazon SageMaker algorithms and frameworks to perform the tasks of hair segmentation and classification.

Semantic segmentation is a computer vision technique that assigns a class label to every pixel in an image, such that pixels with the same label share certain characteristics. Semantic segmentation can be used to identify and isolate different objects or regions in an image, such as a visitor’s hair in a video frame. Amazon SageMaker provides a built-in semantic segmentation algorithm that can train and deploy models for semantic segmentation tasks. The algorithm supports three state-of-the-art network architectures: Fully Convolutional Network (FCN), Pyramid Scene Parsing Network (PSP), and DeepLab v3. The algorithm can also use pre-trained or randomly initialized ResNet-50 or ResNet-101 as the backbone network. The algorithm can be trained using P2/P3 type Amazon EC2 instances in single machine configurations1.

ResNet-50 is a convolutional neural network that is 50 layers deep and can classify images into 1000 object categories. ResNet-50 is trained on more than a million images from the ImageNet database and can achieve high accuracy on various image recognition tasks. ResNet-50 can be used to determine hair style and hair color from the segmented hair regions in the video frames. Amazon SageMaker provides a built-in image classification algorithm that can use ResNet-50 as the network architecture. The algorithm can also perform transfer learning by fine-tuning the pre-trained ResNet-50 model with new data. The algorithm can be trained using P2/P3 type Amazon EC2 instances in single or multiple machine configurations2.

The other options are either less effective or more complex to implement. Using an object detection algorithm to identify a visitor’s hair in video frames would not segment the hair at the pixel level, but only draw bounding boxes around the hair regions. This could result in inaccurate or incomplete hair segmentation, especially if the hair is occluded or has irregular shapes. Using an XGBoost algorithm to determine hair style and hair color would require transforming the segmented hair images into numerical features, which could lose some information or introduce noise. XGBoost is also not designed for image classification tasks, and may not achieve high accuracy or performance.

References:

1: Semantic Segmentation Algorithm - Amazon SageMaker

2: Image Classification Algorithm - Amazon SageMaker

 Residual plots are a model evaluation technique that can be used to understand whether a regression model is more frequently overestimating or underestimating the target. Residual plots are graphs that plot the residuals (the difference between the actual and predicted values) against the predicted values or other variables. Residual plots can help the Machine Learning Specialist to identify the patterns and trends in the residuals, such as the direction, shape, and distribution. Residual plots can also reveal the presence of outliers, heteroscedasticity, non-linearity, or other problems in the model12

To determine whether the model is overestimating or underestimating the target, the Machine Learning Specialist can use a residual plot that plots the residuals against the predicted values. This type of residual plot is also known as a prediction error plot. A prediction error plot can show the magnitude and direction of the errors made by the model. If the model is overestimating the target, the residuals will be negative, and the points will be below the zero line. If the model is underestimating the target, the residuals will be positive, and the points will be above the zero line. If the model is accurate, the residuals will be close to zero, and the points will be scattered around the zero line. A prediction error plot can also show the variance and bias of the model. If the model has high variance, the residuals will have a large spread, and the points will be far from the zero line. If the model has high bias, the residuals will have a systematic pattern, such as a curve or a slope, and the points will not be randomly distributed around the zero line. A prediction error plot can help the Machine Learning Specialist to optimize the model by adjusting the complexity, features, or parameters of the model34

The other options are not valid or suitable for determining whether the model is overestimating or underestimating the target. Root Mean Square Error (RMSE) is a model evaluation metric that measures the average magnitude of the errors made by the model. RMSE is the square root of the mean of the squared residuals. RMSE can indicate the overall accuracy and performance of the model, but it cannot show the direction or distribution of the errors. RMSE can also be influenced by outliers or extreme values, and it may not be comparable across different models or datasets5 Area under the curve (AUC) is a model evaluation metric that measures the ability of the model to distinguish between the positive and negative classes. AUC is the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, which plots the true positive rate against the false positive rate for various classification thresholds. AUC can indicate the overall quality and performance of the model, but it is only applicable for binary classification models, not regression models. AUC cannot show the magnitude or direction of the errors made by the model. Confusion matrix is a model evaluation technique that summarizes the number of correct and incorrect predictions made by the model for each class. A confusion matrix is a table that shows the counts of true positives, false positives, true negatives, and false negatives for each class. A confusion matrix can indicate the accuracy, precision, recall, and F1-score of the model for each class, but it is only applicable for classification models, not regression models. A confusion matrix cannot show the magnitude or direction of the errors made by the model.

Amazon SageMaker Studio Data Wrangler is a visual data preparation tool that enables users to clean and normalize data without writing any code. Using Data Wrangler, the data scientist can easily import the time-series data from various sources, such as Amazon S3, Amazon Athena, or Amazon Redshift. Data Wrangler can automatically generate data insights and quality reports, which can help identify and fix missing values, outliers, and anomalies in the data. Data Wrangler also provides over 250 built-in transformations, such as resampling, interpolation, aggregation, and filtering, which can be applied to the data with a point-and-click interface. Data Wrangler can also export the prepared data to different destinations, such as Amazon S3, Amazon SageMaker Feature Store, or Amazon SageMaker Pipelines, for further modeling and analysis. Data Wrangler is integrated with Amazon SageMaker Studio, a web-based IDE for machine learning, which makes it easy to access and use the tool. Data Wrangler is a serverless and fully managed service, which means the data scientist does not need to provision, configure, or manage any infrastructure or clusters.

Option A is incorrect because Amazon EMR Serverless is a serverless option for running big data analytics applications using open-source frameworks, such as Apache Spark. However, using Amazon EMR Serverless would require the data scientist to write PySpark code to perform the data preparation tasks, such as resampling, imputation, and aggregation. This would require more implementation effort than using Data Wrangler, which provides a visual and code-free interface for data preparation.

Option B is incorrect because AWS Glue DataBrew is another visual data preparation tool that can be used to clean and normalize data without writing code. However, DataBrew does not support time-series data as a data type, and does not provide built-in transformations for resampling, interpolation, or aggregation of time-series data. Therefore, using DataBrew would not meet the requirements of the use case.

Option D is incorrect because using Amazon SageMaker Studio Notebook with Pandas would also require the data scientist to write Python code to perform the data preparation tasks. Pandas is a popular Python library for data analysis and manipulation, which supports time-series data and provides various methods for resampling, interpolation, and aggregation. However, using Pandas would require more implementation effort than using Data Wrangler, which provides a visual and code-free interface for data preparation.

References:

1: Amazon SageMaker Data Wrangler documentation

2: Amazon EMR Serverless documentation

3: AWS Glue DataBrew documentation

4: Pandas documentation

The XGBoost algorithm is a popular machine learning technique for classification problems. It is based on the idea of boosting, which is to combine many weak learners (decision trees) into a strong learner (ensemble model).

The XGBoost algorithm can handle imbalanced data by using the scale_pos_weight parameter, which controls the balance of positive and negative weights in the objective function. A typical value to consider is the ratio of negative cases to positive cases in the data. By increasing this parameter, the algorithm will pay more attention to the minority class (positive) and reduce the number of false negatives.

The XGBoost algorithm can also use different evaluation metrics to optimize the model performance. The default metric is error, which is the misclassification rate. However, this metric can be misleading for imbalanced data, as it does not account for the different costs of false positives and false negatives. A better metric to use is AUC, which is the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. The ROC curve plots the true positive rate against the false positive rate for different threshold values. The AUC measures how well the model can distinguish between the two classes, regardless of the threshold. By changing the eval_metric parameter to AUC, the algorithm will try to maximize the AUC score and reduce the number of false negatives.

Therefore, the combination of steps that should be taken to reduce the number of false negatives are to increase the scale_pos_weight parameter and change the eval_metric parameter to AUC.

References:

XGBoost Parameters

XGBoost for Imbalanced Classification

 The solution that will meet the requirements with the least development time is to use Amazon Kinesis Data Firehose to stream the reservation data directly to Amazon S3, detect high-demand outliers by using Amazon QuickSight ML Insights, and visualize the data in QuickSight. This solution does not require any custom development or ML domain expertise, as it leverages the built-in features of QuickSight ML Insights to automatically run anomaly detection and generate insights on the streaming data. QuickSight ML Insights can also create a visualization dashboard that automatically refreshes with the most recent data, and allows the data scientist to explore the outliers and their key drivers. References:

1: Simplify and automate anomaly detection in streaming data with Amazon Lookout for Metrics | AWS Machine Learning Blog

2: Detecting outliers with ML-powered anomaly detection - Amazon QuickSight

3: Real-time Outlier Detection Over Streaming Data - IEEE Xplore

4: Towards a deep learning-based outlier detection … - Journal of Big Data

Amazon Comprehend is a natural language processing (NLP) service that can perform part-of-speech tagging and key phrase extraction tasks. AWS Deep Learning Containers are Docker images that are pre-installed with popular deep learning frameworks such as Apache MXNet. Amazon SageMaker is a fully managed service that can help build, train, and deploy machine learning models. Using Amazon Comprehend for the text preprocessing tasks and AWS Deep Learning Containers with Amazon SageMaker to build the custom classifier is the solution that can be built most quickly to meet the requirements.

References:

Amazon Comprehend

AWS Deep Learning Containers

Amazon SageMaker

 The best way to address the overfitting problem in image classification is to increase the dropout rate at the flatten layer because the model is not generalized enough. Dropout is a regularization technique that randomly drops out some units from the neural network during training, reducing the co-adaptation of features and preventing overfitting. The flatten layer is the layer that converts the output of the convolutional layers into a one-dimensional vector that can be fed into the dense layers. Increasing the dropout rate at the flatten layer means that more features from the convolutional layers will be ignored, forcing the model to learn more robust and generalizable representations from the remaining features.

The other options are not correct for this scenario because:

Increasing the learning rate would not help with the overfitting problem, as it would make the optimization process more unstable and prone to overshooting the global minimum. A high learning rate can also cause the model to diverge or oscillate around the optimal solution, resulting in poor performance and accuracy.

Increasing the dimensionality of the dense layer next to the flatten layer would not help with the overfitting problem, as it would make the model more complex and increase the number of parameters to be learned. A more complex model can fit the training data better, but it can also memorize the noise and irrelevant details in the data, leading to overfitting and poor generalization.

Increasing the epoch number would not help with the overfitting problem, as it would make the model train longer and more likely to overfit the training data. A high epoch number can cause the model to converge to the global minimum, but it can also cause the model to over-optimize the training data and lose the ability to generalize to new data.

References:

Dropout: A Simple Way to Prevent Neural Networks from Overfitting

How to Reduce Overfitting With Dropout Regularization in Keras

How to Control the Stability of Training Neural Networks With the Learning Rate

How to Choose the Number of Hidden Layers and Nodes in a Feedforward Neural Network?

How to decide the optimal number of epochs to train a neural network?

The best visualization for this task is to create a bar plot, faceted by year, of average sales for each region and add a horizontal line in each facet to represent average sales. This way, the data scientist can easily compare the yearly average sales for each region with the overall average sales and see the trends over time. The bar plot also allows the data scientist to see the relative performance of each region within each year and across years. The other options are less effective because they either do not show the yearly trends, do not show the overall average sales, or do not group the data by region.

References:

pandas.DataFrame.groupby — pandas 2.1.4 documentation

pandas.DataFrame.plot.bar — pandas 2.1.4 documentation

Matplotlib - Bar Plot - Online Tutorials Library

The solution that uses Amazon Comprehend and Amazon CloudWatch is the most suitable for the given scenario. Amazon Comprehend is a natural language processing (NLP) service that can analyze text and extract insights such as sentiment, entities, topics, and syntax. Amazon CloudWatch is a monitoring and observability service that can collect and track metrics, create dashboards, and set alarms based on various thresholds. By using these services, the data science team can quickly and easily implement a solution to monitor the sentiment of social media posts without requiring much infrastructure or data science resources. The solution also meets the requirements of storing the sentiment in both S3 and CloudWatch, and using CloudWatch alarms to notify analysts of trends.

References:

Amazon Comprehend

Amazon CloudWatch

A convolutional neural network (CNN) is a type of deep learning model that can learn to extract features from images and perform tasks such as classification, segmentation, and detection1. ResNet is a popular CNN architecture that uses residual connections to overcome the problem of vanishing gradients and enable very deep networks2. For the task of predicting product quality based on sensor data, a CNN and ResNet approach can leverage the spatial structure of the data and learn complex patterns that distinguish different quality levels.

References:

Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs / ConvNets)

PyTorch ResNet: The Basics and a Quick Tutorial

Amazon SageMaker supports encryption at rest for the ML storage volumes, the model artifacts, and the data in Amazon S3 using AWS Key Management Service (AWS KMS). AWS KMS is a service that allows customers to create and manage encryption keys that can be used to encrypt data. AWS KMS also provides an audit trail of key usage by logging key events to AWS CloudTrail. Customers can use either AWS managed keys or customer managed keys to encrypt their data. AWS managed keys are created and managed by AWS on behalf of the customer, while customer managed keys are created and managed by the customer. Customer managed keys offer more control and flexibility over the key policies, permissions, and rotation. Therefore, to meet the requirements of the company, the best option is to use customer managed keys in AWS KMS to encrypt the ML data volumes, and to encrypt the model artifacts and data in Amazon S3.

The other options are not correct because:

Option A: AWS Cloud HSM is a service that provides hardware security modules (HSMs) to store and use encryption keys. AWS Cloud HSM is not integrated with Amazon SageMaker, and cannot be used to encrypt the ML data volumes, the model artifacts, or the data in Amazon S3. AWS Cloud HSM is more suitable for customers who need to meet strict compliance requirements or who need direct control over the HSMs.

Option B: SageMaker built-in transient keys are temporary keys that are used to encrypt the ML data volumes and are discarded immediately after encryption. These keys do not provide persistent encryption or logging of key usage. Enabling default encryption for new Amazon Elastic Block Store (Amazon EBS) volumes does not affect the ML data volumes, which are encrypted separately by SageMaker. Moreover, this option does not address the encryption of the model artifacts and data in Amazon S3.

Option D: AWS Security Token Service (AWS STS) is a service that provides temporary credentials to access AWS resources. AWS STS does not provide encryption keys or encryption services. AWS STS cannot be used to encrypt the ML storage volumes, the model artifacts, or the data in Amazon S3.

References:

Protect Data at Rest Using Encryption - Amazon SageMaker

What is AWS Key Management Service? - AWS Key Management Service

What is AWS CloudHSM? - AWS CloudHSM

What is AWS Security Token Service? - AWS Security Token Service

 Amazon Rekognition, Amazon Comprehend, and Amazon Transcribe are AWS machine learning services that can analyze and extract metadata from images, text, audio, and video content. These services are easy to use, scalable, and do not require any machine learning expertise. They can help the media company to quickly index its assets and enable rapid identification of relevant content by the research team. Using these services is the fastest route to index the assets, compared to the other options that involve human intervention, custom model development, or additional steps. References:

AWS Media Intelligence Solutions

AWS Machine Learning Services

The Best Services For Running Machine Learning Models On AWS

The combination of actions that will meet the requirements with the least operational overhead is to use SageMaker Clarify to automatically detect data bias and to configure SageMaker Data Wrangler to generate a bias report. SageMaker Clarify is a feature of Amazon SageMaker that provides machine learning (ML) developers with tools to gain greater insights into their ML training data and models. SageMaker Clarify can detect potential bias during data preparation, after model training, and in your deployed model. For instance, you can check for bias related to age in your dataset or in your trained model and receive a detailed report that quantifies different types of potential bias1. SageMaker Data Wrangler is another feature of Amazon SageMaker that enables you to prepare data for machine learning (ML) quickly and easily. You can use SageMaker Data Wrangler to identify potential bias during data preparation without having to write your own code. You specify input features, such as gender or age, and SageMaker Data Wrangler runs an analysis job to detect potential bias in those features. SageMaker Data Wrangler then provides a visual report with a description of the metrics and measurements of potential bias so that you can identify steps to remediate the bias2. The other actions either require more customization (such as using SageMaker Model Monitor or SageMaker Experiments) or do not meet the requirement of detecting data bias (such as using SageMaker Ground Truth). References:

1: Bias Detection and Model Explainability – Amazon Web Services

2: Amazon SageMaker Data Wrangler – Amazon Web Services

Option A is correct because SageMaker Pipelines is a service that enables you to create and manage automated workflows for your machine learning projects. You can use SageMaker Pipelines to orchestrate the steps of data extraction, model training, and model deployment in a repeatable and scalable way1.

Option B is correct because SageMaker Model Monitor is a service that monitors the quality of your models in production and alerts you when there are deviations in the model quality. You can use SageMaker Model Monitor to set an accuracy threshold for your model and configure a CloudWatch alarm that triggers when the threshold is exceeded. You can then connect the alarm to the workflow in SageMaker Pipelines to automatically initiate retraining and deployment of a new version of the model2.

Option C is incorrect because it is not the most operationally efficient way to maintain the model’s accuracy. Creating a daily SageMaker Processing job that reads the predictions from Amazon S3 and checks for changes in model prediction accuracy is a manual and time-consuming process. It also requires you to write custom code to perform the data analysis and send the email notification. Moreover, it does not automatically retrain and deploy the model when the accuracy drops.

Option D is incorrect because it is not the most operationally efficient way to maintain the model’s accuracy. Rerunning the steps in the Jupyter notebook that is hosted on SageMaker Studio notebooks to retrain the model and redeploy a new version of the model is a manual and error-prone process. It also requires you to monitor the model’s performance and initiate the retraining and deployment steps yourself. Moreover, it does not leverage the benefits of SageMaker Pipelines and SageMaker Model Monitor to automate and streamline the workflow.

Option E is incorrect because it is not the most operationally efficient way to maintain the model’s accuracy. Exporting the training and deployment code from the SageMaker Studio notebooks into a Python script and packaging the script into an Amazon ECS task that an AWS Lambda function can initiate is a complex and cumbersome process. It also requires you to manage the infrastructure and resources for the Amazon ECS task and the AWS Lambda function. Moreover, it does not leverage the benefits of SageMaker Pipelines and SageMaker Model Monitor to automate and streamline the workflow.

References:

1: SageMaker Pipelines - Amazon SageMaker

2: Monitor data and model quality - Amazon SageMaker

 The issue described in the question is a sign of overfitting, which is a common problem in machine learning when the model learns the noise and details of the training data too well and fails to generalize to new and unseen data. Overfitting can result in a low training error rate but a high test error rate, which indicates poor performance and validity of the model. There are several techniques that can be used to prevent or reduce overfitting, such as data augmentation and regularization.

Data augmentation is a technique that applies various transformations to the original training data, such as rotation, scaling, cropping, flipping, adding noise, changing brightness, etc., to create new and diverse data samples. Data augmentation can increase the size and diversity of the training data, which can help the model learn more features and patterns and reduce the variance of the model. Data augmentation is especially useful for image data, as it can simulate different scenarios and perspectives that the model may encounter in real life. For example, in the question, the device uses a camera to observe drivers’ behavior, so data augmentation can help the model deal with different lighting conditions, angles, distances, etc. Data augmentation can be done using various libraries and frameworks, such as TensorFlow, PyTorch, Keras, OpenCV, etc12

Regularization is a technique that adds a penalty term to the model’s objective function, which is typically based on the model’s parameters. Regularization can reduce the complexity and flexibility of the model, which can prevent overfitting by avoiding learning the noise and details of the training data. Regularization can also improve the stability and robustness of the model, as it can reduce the sensitivity of the model to small fluctuations in the data. There are different types of regularization, such as L1, L2, dropout, etc., but they all have the same goal of reducing overfitting. L2 regularization, also known as weight decay or ridge regression, is one of the most common and effective regularization techniques. L2 regularization adds the squared norm of the model’s parameters multiplied by a regularization parameter (lambda) to the model’s objective function. L2 regularization can shrink the model’s parameters towards zero, which can reduce the variance of the model and improve the generalization ability of the model. L2 regularization can be implemented using various libraries and frameworks, such as TensorFlow, PyTorch, Keras, Scikit-learn, etc34

The other options are not valid or relevant for resolving the issue of overfitting. Adding vanishing gradient to the model is not a technique, but a problem that occurs when the gradient of the model’s objective function becomes very small and the model stops learning. Making the neural network architecture complex is not a solution, but a possible cause of overfitting, as a complex model can have more parameters and more flexibility to fit the training data too well. Using gradient checking in the model is not a technique, but a debugging method that verifies the correctness of the gradient computation in the model. Gradient checking is not related to overfitting, but to the implementation of the model.

 The best solution for implementing the testing model with the least amount of operational overhead is to use the following steps:

Update the DesiredWeightsAndCapacity data type with the new version of the model by using the UpdateEndpointWeightsAndCapacities operation with the DesiredWeight parameter set to 0. This operation allows the developers to update the variant weights and capacities of an existing SageMaker endpoint without deleting and recreating the endpoint. Setting the DesiredWeight parameter to 0 means that the new version of the model will not receive any traffic initially1

Specify the TargetVariant parameter for InvokeEndpoint calls for users who subscribed to the preview feature. This parameter allows the developers to override the variant weights and direct a request to a specific variant. This way, the developers can test the new version of the model for a limited number of users who opted in for the preview feature2

When the new version of the model is ready for release, gradually increase DesiredWeight until all users have the updated version. This operation allows the developers to perform a gradual rollout of the new version of the model and monitor its performance and accuracy. The developers can adjust the variant weights and capacities as needed until the new version of the model serves all the traffic1

The other options are incorrect because they either require more operational overhead or do not support the desired use cases. For example:

Option A uses the CreateEndpointConfig operation with the InitialVariantWeight parameter set to 0. This operation creates a new endpoint configuration, which requires deleting and recreating the endpoint to apply the changes. This adds extra overhead and downtime for the endpoint. It also does not support the gradual rollout of the new version of the model3

Option B uses two SageMaker hosted endpoints that serve the different versions of the model and an Application Load Balancer (ALB) to route traffic to both endpoints based on the TargetVariant query string parameter. This option requires creating and managing additional resources and services, such as the second endpoint and the ALB. It also requires changing the app code to send the query string parameter for the preview feature4

Option D uses the access key and secret key of the IAM user with appropriate KMS and ECR permissions. This is not a secure way to pass credentials to the Processing job. It also requires the ML specialist to manage the IAM user and the keys.

References:

1: UpdateEndpointWeightsAndCapacities - Amazon SageMaker

2: InvokeEndpoint - Amazon SageMaker

3: CreateEndpointConfig - Amazon SageMaker

4: Application Load Balancer - Elastic Load Balancing

 The best approach to maximize transcription accuracy during the development phase is to create a custom vocabulary file containing each product name with phonetic pronunciations, and use it with Amazon Transcribe to perform the ASR customization. A custom vocabulary is a list of words and phrases that are likely to appear in your audio input, along with optional information about how to pronounce them. By using a custom vocabulary, you can improve the transcription accuracy of domain-specific terms, such as product names, that may not be recognized by the general vocabulary of Amazon Transcribe. You can also analyze the transcripts and manually update the custom vocabulary file to include updated or additional entries for those names that are not being correctly identified.

The other options are not as effective as option C for the following reasons:

Option A is not suitable because Amazon Lex is a service for building conversational interfaces, not for transcribing voicemail messages. Amazon Lex also has a limit of 100 slots per bot, which is not enough to accommodate the 200 unique product names required by the company.

Option B is not optimal because it relies on the word confidence scores in the transcript, which may not be accurate enough to identify all the mis-transcribed product names. Moreover, automatically creating or updating a custom vocabulary file may introduce errors or inconsistencies in the pronunciation or display of the words.

Option D is not feasible because it requires a large amount of training data to build a custom language model. The company only has 4,000 words of Amazon SageMaker Ground Truth voicemail transcripts, which is not enough to train a robust and reliable custom language model. Additionally, creating and updating a custom language model is a time-consuming and resource-intensive process, which may not be suitable for the development phase where frequent changes are expected.

References:

Amazon Transcribe – Custom Vocabulary

Amazon Transcribe – Custom Language Models

[Amazon Lex – Limits]

According to the Amazon Kinesis Data Streams documentation, the maximum size of data blob (the data payload before Base64-encoding) per record is 1 MB. The maximum number of records that can be sent to a shard per second is 1,000. Therefore, the maximum throughput of a shard is 1 MB/sec for input and 2 MB/sec for output. In this case, the input throughput is 100 transactions per second * 100 KB per transaction = 10 MB/sec. Therefore, the minimum number of shards required is 10 MB/sec / 1 MB/sec = 10 shards. However, the question asks for the minimum number of shards in Kinesis Data Streams, not the minimum number of shards per stream. A Kinesis Data Streams account can have multiple streams, each with its own number of shards. Therefore, the minimum number of shards in Kinesis Data Streams is 1, which is the minimum number of shards per stream. References:

Amazon Kinesis Data Streams Terminology and Concepts

Amazon Kinesis Data Streams Limits

The correct solution for changing the scaling behavior of the SageMaker instances is to increase the cooldown period for the scale-out activity. The cooldown period is the amount of time, in seconds, after a scaling activity completes before another scaling activity can start. By increasing the cooldown period for the scale-out activity, the ML team can ensure that the new instances are ready before launching additional instances. This will prevent over-scaling and reduce costs1

The other options are incorrect because they either do not solve the issue or require unnecessary steps. For example:

Option A decreases the cooldown period for the scale-in activity and increases the configured maximum capacity of instances. This option does not address the issue of launching additional instances before the new instances are ready. It may also cause under-scaling and performance degradation.

Option B replaces the current endpoint with a multi-model endpoint using SageMaker. A multi-model endpoint is an endpoint that can host multiple models using a single endpoint. It does not affect the scaling behavior of the SageMaker instances. It also requires creating a new endpoint and updating the application code to use it2

Option C sets up Amazon API Gateway and AWS Lambda to trigger the SageMaker inference endpoint. Amazon API Gateway is a service that allows users to create, publish, maintain, monitor, and secure APIs. AWS Lambda is a service that lets users run code without provisioning or managing servers. These services do not affect the scaling behavior of the SageMaker instances. They also require creating and configuring additional resources and services34

References:

1: Automatic Scaling - Amazon SageMaker

2: Create a Multi-Model Endpoint - Amazon SageMaker

3: Amazon API Gateway - Amazon Web Services

4: AWS Lambda - Amazon Web Services

To build a conversational interface that can use natural language to get data from the reports, the company can use a combination of services that can handle both written and spoken inputs, understand the user’s intent and query, and extract the relevant information from the reports. The services that can be used for this purpose are:

Amazon Lex: A service for building conversational interfaces into any application using voice and text. Amazon Lex can create chatbots that can interact with users using natural language, and integrate with other AWS services such as Amazon Connect, Amazon Comprehend, and Amazon Transcribe. Amazon Lex can also use lambda functions to implement the business logic and fulfill the user’s requests.

Amazon Comprehend: A service for natural language processing and text analytics. Amazon Comprehend can analyze text and speech inputs and extract insights such as entities, key phrases, sentiment, syntax, and topics. Amazon Comprehend can also use custom classifiers and entity recognizers to identify specific terms and concepts that are relevant to the domain of the reports.

Amazon Transcribe: A service for speech-to-text conversion. Amazon Transcribe can transcribe audio inputs into text outputs, and add punctuation and formatting. Amazon Transcribe can also use custom vocabularies and language models to improve the accuracy and quality of the transcription for the specific domain of the reports.

Therefore, the company can use the following architecture to build the conversational interface:

Use Amazon Lex to create a chatbot that can accept both written and spoken inputs from the executives. The chatbot can use intents, utterances, and slots to capture the user’s query and parameters, such as the report name, date, metric, or filter.

Use Amazon Transcribe to convert the spoken inputs into text outputs, and pass them to Amazon Lex. Amazon Transcribe can use a custom vocabulary and language model to recognize the terms and concepts related to the reports.

Use Amazon Comprehend to analyze the text inputs and outputs, and extract the relevant information from the reports. Amazon Comprehend can use a custom classifier and entity recognizer to identify the report name, date, metric, or filter from the user’s query, and the corresponding data from the reports.

Use a lambda function to implement the business logic and fulfillment of the user’s query, such as retrieving the data from the reports, performing calculations or aggregations, and formatting the response. The lambda function can also handle errors and validations, and provide feedback to the user.

Use Amazon Lex to return the response to the user, either in text or speech format, depending on the user’s preference.

References:

What Is Amazon Lex?

What Is Amazon Comprehend?

What Is Amazon Transcribe?

The best solution to improve the accuracy of the model and receive notifications for any future performance issues is to perform incremental training to update the model and activate Amazon SageMaker Model Monitor to detect model performance issues and to send notifications. Incremental training is a technique that allows you to update an existing model with new data without retraining the entire model from scratch. This can save time and resources, and help the model adapt to changing data patterns. Amazon SageMaker Model Monitor is a feature that continuously monitors the quality of machine learning models in production and notifies you when there are deviations in the model quality, such as data drift and anomalies. You can set up alerts that trigger actions, such as sending notifications to Amazon Simple Notification Service (Amazon SNS) topics, when certain conditions are met.

Option B is incorrect because Amazon SageMaker Model Governance is a set of tools that help you implement ML responsibly by simplifying access control and enhancing transparency. It does not provide a mechanism to automatically adjust model hyperparameters or improve model accuracy.

Option C is incorrect because Amazon SageMaker Debugger is a feature that helps you debug and optimize your model training process by capturing relevant data and providing real-time analysis. However, using Debugger alone does not update the model or monitor its performance in production. Also, retraining the model by using only data from the previous several months may not capture the full range of data variability and may introduce bias or overfitting.

Option D is incorrect because using only data from the previous several months to perform incremental training may not be sufficient to improve the model accuracy, as explained above. Moreover, this option does not specify how to activate Amazon SageMaker Model Monitor or configure the alerts and notifications.

References:

Incremental training

Amazon SageMaker Model Monitor

Amazon SageMaker Model Governance

Amazon SageMaker Debugger

 The data ingestion rate into Amazon S3 can be improved by increasing the number of shards for the data stream. A shard is the base throughput unit of a Kinesis data stream. One shard provides 1 MB/second data input and 2 MB/second data output. Increasing the number of shards increases the data ingestion capacity of the stream. This can help reduce the backlog of data for Kinesis Data Streams and Kinesis Data Firehose to ingest.

References:

Shard - Amazon Kinesis Data Streams

Scaling Amazon Kinesis Data Streams with AWS CloudFormation - AWS Big Data Blog

The data scientist should remove the stop words from the blog post data by using the Count Vectorizer function in the scikit-learn library, and replace the blog post data in the S3 bucket with the results of the vectorizer. This is because:

The Count Vectorizer function is a tool that can convert a collection of text documents to a matrix of token counts 1. It also enables the pre-processing of text data prior to generating the vector representation, such as removing accents, converting to lowercase, and filtering out stop words 1. By using this function, the data scientist can remove the stop words such as “a,” “an,” and “the” from the blog post data, and obtain a numerical representation of the text that can be used as input for the NTM algorithm.

The NTM algorithm is a neural network-based topic modeling technique that can learn latent topics from a corpus of documents 2. It can be used to recommend tags from blog posts by finding the most probable topics for each document, and ranking the words associated with each topic 3. However, the NTM algorithm does not perform any text pre-processing by itself, so it relies on the quality of the input data. Therefore, the data scientist should replace the blog post data in the S3 bucket with the results of the vectorizer, to ensure that the NTM algorithm does not include the stop words in the tag recommendations.

The other options are not suitable for the following reasons:

Option A is not relevant because the Amazon Comprehend entity recognition API operations are used to detect and extract named entities from text, such as people, places, organizations, dates, etc4. This is not the same as removing stop words, which are common words that do not carry much meaning or information. Moreover, removing the detected entities from the blog post data may reduce the quality and diversity of the tag recommendations, as some entities may be relevant and useful as tags.

Option B is not optimal because the SageMaker built-in principal component analysis (PCA) algorithm is used to reduce the dimensionality of a dataset by finding the most important features that capture the maximum amount of variance in the data 5. This is not the same as removing stop words, which are words that have low variance and high frequency in the data. Moreover, replacing the blog post data in the S3 bucket with the results of the PCA algorithm may not be compatible with the input format expected by the NTM algorithm, which requires a bag-of-words representation of the text 2.

Option C is not suitable because the SageMaker built-in Object Detection algorithm is used to detect and localize objects in images 6. This is not related to the task of recommending tags from blog posts, which are text documents. Moreover, using the Object Detection algorithm instead of the NTM algorithm would require a different type of input data (images instead of text), and a different type of output data (bounding boxes and labels instead of topics and words).

References:

Neural Topic Model (NTM) Algorithm

Introduction to the Amazon SageMaker Neural Topic Model

Amazon Comprehend - Entity Recognition

sklearn.feature_extraction.text.CountVectorizer

Principal Component Analysis (PCA) Algorithm

Object Detection Algorithm

The most secure action to protect the data from being accessed and transferred to a remote host by malicious code accidentally installed on the training container is to enable network isolation for training jobs. Network isolation is a feature that allows you to run training and inference containers in internet-free mode, which blocks any outbound network calls from the containers, even to other AWS services such as Amazon S3. Additionally, no AWS credentials are made available to the container runtime environment. This way, you can prevent unauthorized access to your data and resources by malicious code or users. You can enable network isolation by setting the EnableNetworkIsolation parameter to True when you call CreateTrainingJob, CreateHyperParameterTuningJob, or CreateModel.

References:

Run Training and Inference Containers in Internet-Free Mode - Amazon SageMaker

The solution that the agency should consider is to use a proxy server at each local office and for each camera, and stream the RTSP feed to a unique Amazon Kinesis Video Streams video stream. On each stream, use Amazon Rekognition Video and create a stream processor to detect faces from a collection of known employees, and alert when non-employees are detected.

This solution has the following advantages:

It can handle thousands of video cameras in real time, as Amazon Kinesis Video Streams can scale elastically to support any number of producers and consumers1.

It can leverage the Amazon Rekognition Video API, which is designed and optimized for video analysis, and can detect faces in challenging conditions such as low lighting, occlusions, and different poses2.

It can use a stream processor, which is a feature of Amazon Rekognition Video that allows you to create a persistent application that analyzes streaming video and stores the results in a Kinesis data stream3. The stream processor can compare the detected faces with a collection of known employees, which is a container for persisting faces that you want to search for in the input video stream4. The stream processor can also send notifications to Amazon Simple Notification Service (Amazon SNS) when non-employees are detected, which can trigger downstream actions such as sending alerts or storing the events in Amazon Elasticsearch Service (Amazon ES)3.

References:

1: What Is Amazon Kinesis Video Streams? - Amazon Kinesis Video Streams

2: Detecting and Analyzing Faces - Amazon Rekognition

3: Using Amazon Rekognition Video Stream Processor - Amazon Rekognition

4: Working with Stored Faces - Amazon Rekognition

 To meet the requirements with the least operational overhead, the company should use AWS Glue crawlers, AWS Glue workflows and jobs, and Amazon Fraud Detector. AWS Glue crawlers can scan the data in Amazon S3 and identify the schema, which is then stored in the AWS Glue Data Catalog. AWS Glue workflows and jobs can perform data transformations on the data in Amazon S3 using serverless Spark or Python scripts. Amazon Fraud Detector can train a model to detect fraud using the transformed data and the company’s historical fraud labels, and then generate fraud predictions using a simple API call.

Option A is incorrect because Amazon Athena is a serverless query service that can analyze data in Amazon S3 using standard SQL, but it does not perform data transformations or fraud detection.

Option C is incorrect because Amazon Redshift is a cloud data warehouse that can store and query data using SQL, but it requires provisioning and managing clusters, which adds operational overhead. Moreover, Amazon Redshift does not provide a built-in fraud detection capability.

Option E is incorrect because Amazon Redshift ML is a feature that allows users to create, train, and deploy machine learning models using SQL commands in Amazon Redshift. However, using Amazon Redshift ML would require loading the data from Amazon S3 to Amazon Redshift, which adds complexity and cost. Also, Amazon Redshift ML does not support fraud detection as a use case.

References:

AWS Glue Crawlers

AWS Glue Workflows and Jobs

Amazon Fraud Detector

Option A is correct because reducing the number of features with the SageMaker PCA algorithm can help remove noise and redundancy from the data, and improve the model’s performance. PCA is a dimensionality reduction technique that transforms the original features into a smaller set of linearly uncorrelated features called principal components. The SageMaker linear learner algorithm supports PCA as a built-in feature transformation option.

Option E is correct because using the SageMaker k-NN algorithm with a dimension reduction target of less than 1,000 can help the model learn from the similarity of the data points, and improve the model’s performance. k-NN is a non-parametric algorithm that classifies an input based on the majority vote of its k nearest neighbors in the feature space. The SageMaker k-NN algorithm supports dimension reduction as a built-in feature transformation option.

Option B is incorrect because using the scikit-learn MDS algorithm to reduce the number of features is not a feasible option, as MDS is a computationally expensive technique that does not scale well to large datasets. MDS is a dimensionality reduction technique that tries to preserve the pairwise distances between the original data points in a lower-dimensional space.

Option C is incorrect because setting the predictor type to regressor would change the model’s objective from classification to regression, which is not suitable for the given problem. A regressor model would output a continuous value instead of a binary label for each phone.

Option D is incorrect because using the SageMaker k-means algorithm with k of less than 1,000 would not help the model classify the phones, as k-means is a clustering algorithm that groups the data points into k clusters based on their similarity, without using any labels. A clustering model would not output a binary label for each phone.

References:

Amazon SageMaker Linear Learner Algorithm

Amazon SageMaker K-Nearest Neighbors (k-NN) Algorithm

[Principal Component Analysis - Scikit-learn]

[Multidimensional Scaling - Scikit-learn]

An Amazon S3 data lake is a cost-effective solution for storing and analyzing large amounts of time-based training data for a new model. Amazon S3 is a highly scalable, durable, and secure object storage service that can store any amount of data in any format. Amazon S3 also offers low-cost storage classes, such as S3 Standard-IA and S3 One Zone-IA, that can reduce the storage costs for infrequently accessed data. By using hourly object prefixes, the Machine Learning Specialist can organize the data into logical partitions based on the time of ingestion. This can enable efficient data access and management, as well as support incremental updates and deletes. The Specialist can also use Amazon S3 lifecycle policies to automatically transition the data to lower-cost storage classes or delete the data after a certain period of time. This way, the Specialist can always train on the last 24 hours of the data and optimize the storage costs.

References:

What is a data lake? - Amazon Web Services

Amazon S3 Storage Classes - Amazon Simple Storage Service

Managing your storage lifecycle - Amazon Simple Storage Service

Best Practices Design Patterns: Optimizing Amazon S3 Performance

 Binary classification is a type of supervised learning problem where the goal is to predict a categorical label that has only two possible values, such as Yes or No, True or False, Positive or Negative. In this case, the label is whether a transaction is fraudulent or not, which is a binary outcome. Binary classification can be used to estimate the probability of an observation belonging to a certain class, such as the probability of a transaction being fraudulent. This can help the business to make decisions based on the risk level of each transaction. References:

Binary Classification - Amazon Machine Learning

AWS Certified Machine Learning - Specialty Sample Questions

The data scientist should adjust hyperparameters related to the attention mechanism to resolve the problem. The attention mechanism is a technique that allows the decoder to focus on different parts of the input sequence when generating the output sequence. It helps the model cope with long input sequences and improve the translation quality. The Amazon SageMaker seq2seq algorithm supports different types of attention mechanisms, such as dot, general, concat, and mlp. The data scientist can use the hyperparameter attention_type to choose the type of attention mechanism. The data scientist can also use the hyperparameter attention_coverage_type to enable coverage, which is a mechanism that penalizes the model for attending to the same input positions repeatedly. By adjusting these hyperparameters, the data scientist can fine-tune the attention mechanism and reduce the number of false negative predictions by the model.

References:

Sequence-to-Sequence Algorithm - Amazon SageMaker

Attention Mechanism - Sockeye Documentation

The best approach to address all of the requirements with the least development effort is to create an AWS Glue job, convert the scripts to PySpark, execute the pipeline, and store the results in Amazon S3. This is because:

AWS Glue is a fully managed extract, transform, and load (ETL) service that makes it easy to prepare and load data for analytics 1. AWS Glue can run Python and Scala scripts to process data from various sources, such as Amazon S3, Amazon DynamoDB, Amazon Redshift, and more 2. AWS Glue also provides a serverless Apache Spark environment to run ETL jobs, eliminating the need to provision and manage servers 3.

PySpark is the Python API for Apache Spark, a unified analytics engine for large-scale data processing 4. PySpark can perform various data transformations and manipulations on structured and unstructured data, such as cleaning, enriching, and compressing 5. PySpark can also leverage the distributed computing power of Spark to handle terabytes of data efficiently and scalably 6.

By creating an AWS Glue job and converting the scripts to PySpark, the company can move the scripts out of Amazon EC2 into a more managed solution that will eliminate the need to maintain servers. The company can also reduce the development effort by using the AWS Glue console, AWS SDK, or AWS CLI to create and run the job 7. Moreover, the company can use the AWS Glue Data Catalog to store and manage the metadata of the data sources and targets 8.

The other options are not as suitable as option C for the following reasons:

Option A is not optimal because loading the data into an Amazon Redshift cluster and executing the pipeline by using SQL will incur additional costs and complexity for the company. Amazon Redshift is a fully managed data warehouse service that enables fast and scalable analysis of structured data . However, it is not designed for ETL purposes, such as cleaning, transforming, enriching, and compressing data. Moreover, using SQL to perform these tasks may not be as expressive and flexible as using Python scripts. Furthermore, the company will have to provision and configure the Amazon Redshift cluster, and load and unload the data from Amazon S3, which will increase the development effort and time.

Option B is not feasible because loading the data into Amazon DynamoDB and converting the scripts to an AWS Lambda function will not work for the company’s use case. Amazon DynamoDB is a fully managed key-value and document database service that provides fast and consistent performance at any scale . However, it is not suitable for storing and processing terabytes of data daily, as it has limits on the size and throughput of each table and item . Moreover, using AWS Lambda to execute the pipeline will not be efficient or cost-effective, as Lambda has limits on the memory, CPU, and execution time of each function . Therefore, using Amazon DynamoDB and AWS Lambda will not meet the company’s requirements for processing large amounts of data quickly and reliably.

Option D is not relevant because creating a set of individual AWS Lambda functions to execute each of the scripts and building a step function by using the AWS Step Functions Data Science SDK will not address the main issue of moving the scripts out of Amazon EC2. AWS Step Functions is a fully managed service that lets you coordinate multiple AWS services into serverless workflows . The AWS Step Functions Data Science SDK is an open source library that allows data scientists to easily create workflows that process and publish machine learning models using Amazon SageMaker and AWS Step Functions . However, these services and tools are not designed for ETL purposes, such as cleaning, transforming, enriching, and compressing data. Moreover, as mentioned in option B, using AWS Lambda to execute the scripts will not be efficient or cost-effective for the company’s use case.

References:

What Is AWS Glue?

AWS Glue Components

AWS Glue Serverless Spark ETL

PySpark - Overview

PySpark - RDD

PySpark - SparkContext

Adding Jobs in AWS Glue

Populating the AWS Glue Data Catalog

[What Is Amazon Redshift?]

[What Is Amazon DynamoDB?]

[Service, Account, and Table Quotas in DynamoDB]

[AWS Lambda quotas]

[What Is AWS Step Functions?]

[AWS Step Functions Data Science SDK for Python]

The Recordio protobuf format is a binary data format that is optimized for training on SageMaker. It allows faster data loading and lower memory usage compared to other formats such as CSV or numpy arrays. The Recordio protobuf format also supports features such as sparse input, variable-length input, and label embedding. To use the Recordio protobuf format, the data needs to be serialized and deserialized using the appropriate libraries. Some of the built-in algorithms in SageMaker support the Recordio protobuf format as a content type for training and inference. References:

Common Data Formats for Training

Using RecordIO Format

Content Types Supported by Built-in Algorithms

The best way to meet the requirements is to use a principal component analysis (PCA) model, which is a technique that reduces the dimensionality of the dataset by transforming the original variables into a smaller set of new variables, called principal components, that capture most of the variance and information in the data1. This technique has the following advantages:

It can increase the accuracy of the model by removing noise, redundancy, and multicollinearity from the data, and by enhancing the interpretability and generalization of the model23.

It can decrease the processing time of the model by reducing the number of features and the computational complexity of the model, and by improving the convergence and stability of the model45.

It is suitable for numeric variables, as it relies on the covariance or correlation matrix of the data, and it can handle a large quantity of variables, as it can extract the most relevant ones16.

The other options are not effective or appropriate, because they have the following drawbacks:

A: Creating new features and interaction variables can increase the accuracy of the model by capturing more complex and nonlinear relationships in the data, but it can also increase the processing time of the model by adding more features and increasing the computational complexity of the model7. Moreover, it can introduce more noise, redundancy, and multicollinearity in the data, which can degrade the performance and interpretability of the model8.

C: Applying normalization on the feature set can increase the accuracy of the model by scaling the features to a common range and avoiding the dominance of some features over others, but it can also decrease the processing time of the model by reducing the numerical instability and improving the convergence of the model . However, normalization alone is not enough to address the high dimensionality and high latency issues of the dataset, as it does not reduce the number of features or the variance in the data.

D: Using a multiple correspondence analysis (MCA) model is not suitable for numeric variables, as it is a technique that reduces the dimensionality of the dataset by transforming the original categorical variables into a smaller set of new variables, called factors, that capture most of the inertia and information in the data. MCA is similar to PCA, but it is designed for nominal or ordinal variables, not for continuous or interval variables.

References:

1: Principal Component Analysis - Amazon SageMaker

2: How to Use PCA for Data Visualization and Improved Performance in Machine Learning | by Pratik Shukla | Towards Data Science

3: Principal Component Analysis (PCA) for Feature Selection and some of its Pitfalls | by Nagesh Singh Chauhan | Towards Data Science

4: How to Reduce Dimensionality with PCA and Train a Support Vector Machine in Python | by James Briggs | Towards Data Science

5: Dimensionality Reduction and Its Applications | by Aniruddha Bhandari | Towards Data Science

6: Principal Component Analysis (PCA) in Python | by Susan Li | Towards Data Science

7: Feature Engineering for Machine Learning | by Dipanjan (DJ) Sarkar | Towards Data Science

8: Feature Engineering — How to Engineer Features and How to Get Good at It | by Parul Pandey | Towards Data Science

: [Feature Scaling for Machine Learning: Understanding the Difference Between Normalization vs. Standardization | by Benjamin Obi Tayo Ph.D. | Towards Data Science]

: [Why, How and When to Scale your Features | by George Seif | Towards Data Science]

: [Normalization vs Dimensionality Reduction | by Saurabh Annadate | Towards Data Science]

: [Multiple Correspondence Analysis - Amazon SageMaker]

: [Multiple Correspondence Analysis (MCA) | by Raul Eulogio | Towards Data Science]

In a classification model, features with significantly larger scales can dominate the model training process, leading to poor performance. Normalization scales the values of continuous features to a uniform range, such as [0, 1], which prevents large-value features from disproportionately influencing the model. This is particularly beneficial for algorithms sensitive to the scale of input data, such as neural networks or distance-based algorithms.

Given that the problematic features are informative and representative of the target distribution, removing or bootstrapping these features is not advisable. Normalization will bring all features to a similar scale and improve the model's inference accuracy without losing important information.

 Based on the figure provided, a decision tree would have the highest recall with respect to the fraudulent class. Recall is a model evaluation metric that measures the proportion of actual positive instances that are correctly classified by the model. Recall is calculated as follows:

Recall = True Positives / (True Positives + False Negatives)

A decision tree is a type of machine learning model that can perform classification tasks by splitting the data into smaller and purer subsets based on a series of rules or conditions. A decision tree can handle both linear and non-linear data, and can capture complex patterns and interactions among the features. A decision tree can also be easily visualized and interpreted1

In this case, the data is not linearly separable, and has a clear pattern of seasonality. The fraudulent class forms a large circle in the center of the plot, while the normal class is scattered around the edges. A decision tree can use the transaction month and the age of account as the splitting criteria, and create a circular boundary that separates the fraudulent class from the normal class. A decision tree can achieve a high recall for the fraudulent class, as it can correctly identify most of the black dots as positive instances, and minimize the number of false negatives. A decision tree can also adjust the depth and complexity of the tree to balance the trade-off between recall and precision23

The other options are not valid or suitable for achieving a high recall for the fraudulent class. A linear support vector machine (SVM) is a type of machine learning model that can perform classification tasks by finding a linear hyperplane that maximizes the margin between the classes. A linear SVM can handle linearly separable data, but not non-linear data. A linear SVM cannot capture the circular pattern of the fraudulent class, and may misclassify many of the black dots as negative instances, resulting in a low recall4 A naive Bayesian classifier is a type of machine learning model that can perform classification tasks by applying the Bayes’ theorem and assuming conditional independence among the features. A naive Bayesian classifier can handle both linear and non-linear data, and can incorporate prior knowledge and probabilities into the model. However, a naive Bayesian classifier may not perform well when the features are correlated or dependent, as in this case. A naive Bayesian classifier may not capture the circular pattern of the fraudulent class, and may misclassify many of the black dots as negative instances, resulting in a low recall5 A single perceptron with sigmoidal activation function is a type of machine learning model that can perform classification tasks by applying a weighted linear combination of the features and a non-linear activation function. A single perceptron with sigmoidal activation function can handle linearly separable data, but not non-linear data. A single perceptron with sigmoidal activation function cannot capture the circular pattern of the fraudulent class, and may misclassify many of the black dots as negative instances, resulting in a low recall.

K-means clustering is a machine learning technique that can be used to classify unlabeled data into different groups based on their similarity. It is an unsupervised learning method, which means it does not require any prior knowledge or labels for the data. K-means clustering works by randomly assigning data points to a number of clusters, then iteratively updating the cluster centers and reassigning the data points until the clusters are stable. The result is a partition of the data into distinct and homogeneous groups. K-means clustering can be useful for exploratory data analysis, data compression, anomaly detection, and feature extraction. References:

K-Means Clustering: A tutorial on how to use K-means clustering with Amazon SageMaker.

Unsupervised Learning: A video that explains the concept and applications of unsupervised learning.

Normalization is a data preprocessing technique that can be used to scale the input features to a common range, such as [-1, 1] or [0, 1]. Normalization can help reduce the effect of outliers, improve the convergence of gradient-based algorithms, and prevent variables with a larger magnitude from dominating the model. One common method of normalization is standardization, which transforms each feature to have a mean of 0 and a variance of 1. This can be done by subtracting the mean and dividing by the standard deviation of each feature. Standardization can be useful for models that assume the input features are normally distributed, such as linear regression, logistic regression, and support vector machines. References:

Data normalization and standardization: A video that explains the concept and benefits of data normalization and standardization.

Standardize or Normalize?: A blog post that compares different methods of scaling the input features.

To develop a daily ETL workflow containing multiple ETL jobs that can start as soon as data is uploaded to Amazon S3, the best configuration is to use AWS Lambda to trigger an AWS Step Functions workflow to wait for dataset uploads to complete in Amazon S3. Use AWS Glue to join the datasets. Use an Amazon CloudWatch alarm to send an SNS notification to the Administrator in the case of a failure.

AWS Lambda is a serverless compute service that lets you run code without provisioning or managing servers. You can use Lambda to create functions that respond to events such as data uploads to Amazon S3. You can also use Lambda to invoke other AWS services such as AWS Step Functions and AWS Glue.

AWS Step Functions is a service that lets you coordinate multiple AWS services into serverless workflows. You can use Step Functions to create a state machine that defines the sequence and logic of your ETL workflow. You can also use Step Functions to handle errors and retries, and to monitor the execution status of your workflow.

AWS Glue is a serverless data integration service that makes it easy to discover, prepare, and combine data for analytics. You can use Glue to create and run ETL jobs that can join data from multiple sources in Amazon S3. You can also use Glue to catalog your data and make it searchable and queryable.

Amazon CloudWatch is a service that monitors your AWS resources and applications. You can use CloudWatch to create alarms that trigger actions when a metric or a log event meets a specified threshold. You can also use CloudWatch to send notifications to Amazon Simple Notification Service (SNS) topics, which can then deliver the notifications to subscribers such as email addresses or phone numbers.

Therefore, by using these services together, you can achieve the following benefits:

You can start the ETL workflow as soon as data is uploaded to Amazon S3 by using Lambda functions to trigger Step Functions workflows.

You can wait for all the datasets to be available in Amazon S3 by using Step Functions to poll the S3 buckets and check the data completeness.

You can join the datasets with terabyte-sized datasets in Amazon S3 by using Glue ETL jobs that can scale and parallelize the data processing.

You can store the results of joining datasets in Amazon S3 by using Glue ETL jobs to write the output to S3 buckets.

You can send a notification to the Administrator if one of the jobs fails by using CloudWatch alarms to monitor the Step Functions or Glue metrics and send SNS notifications in case of a failure.

The company needs to transcribe petabytes of audio files from an on-premises VoIP system to an S3 bucket in the AWS Cloud. The transcription algorithm requires GPUs for inference, which are not available on the on-premises system. The VPN connection over a 100 Mbps connection is not sufficient to transfer the large amount of data quickly. Therefore, the company should use an AWS Snowball Edge Compute Optimized device with an NVIDIA Tesla module to run the transcription algorithm locally and leverage the GPU power. The device can store up to 42 TB of data and can be shipped back to AWS for data ingestion. The company can use AWS DataSync to send the resulting transcriptions to the transcription S3 bucket in the AWS Cloud. This solution minimizes the network bandwidth and latency issues and enables faster data processing and transfer.

Option B is incorrect because AWS Snowcone is a small, portable, rugged, and secure edge computing and data transfer device that can store up to 8 TB of data. It is not suitable for processing petabytes of data and does not support GPU-based instances.

Option C is incorrect because AWS Outposts is a service that extends AWS infrastructure, services, APIs, and tools to virtually any data center, co-location space, or on-premises facility. It is not designed for data transfer and ingestion, and it would require additional infrastructure and maintenance costs.

Option D is incorrect because AWS DataSync is a service that makes it easy to move large amounts of data to and from AWS over the internet or AWS Direct Connect. However, using DataSync to ingest the audio files to S3 would still be limited by the network bandwidth and latency. Moreover, running the transcription algorithm on AWS Lambda would incur additional costs and complexity, and it would not leverage the GPU power that the algorithm requires.

References:

AWS Snowball Edge Compute Optimized

AWS DataSync

AWS Snowcone

AWS Outposts

AWS Lambda

Amazon SageMaker script mode is a feature that allows users to use training scripts similar to those they would use outside SageMaker with SageMaker’s prebuilt containers for various frameworks such as TensorFlow. Script mode supports reading data from Amazon S3 buckets without requiring any changes to the training script. Therefore, option B is the best method of providing training data to Amazon SageMaker that would meet the business requirements with the least development overhead.

Option A is incorrect because using a local path of the data would not be scalable or reliable, as it would depend on the availability and capacity of the local storage. Moreover, using a local path of the data would not leverage the benefits of Amazon S3, such as durability, security, and performance. Option C is incorrect because rewriting the train.py script to convert TFRecords to protobuf would require additional development effort and complexity, as well as introduce potential errors and inconsistencies in the data format. Option D is incorrect because preparing the data in the format accepted by Amazon SageMaker would also require additional development effort and complexity, as well as involve using additional services such as AWS Glue or AWS Lambda, which would increase the cost and maintenance of the solution.

References:

Bring your own model with Amazon SageMaker script mode

GitHub - aws-samples/amazon-sagemaker-script-mode

Deep Dive on TensorFlow training with Amazon SageMaker and Amazon S3

amazon-sagemaker-script-mode/generate_cifar10_tfrecords.py at master

 Amazon SageMaker is a service that allows users to build, train, and deploy ML models on AWS. Amazon SageMaker endpoints are scalable and secure web services that can be used to perform real-time inference on ML models. An endpoint configuration defines the models that are deployed and the resources that are used by the endpoint. An endpoint configuration can have multiple production variants, each representing a different version or variant of a model. Users can specify the portion of the inferences served by each production variant using the initialVariantWeight parameter. Users can also programmatically update the endpoint configuration to change the portion of the inferences served by each production variant using the UpdateEndpointWeightsAndCapacities API. Therefore, option B is the best solution to satisfy the requirements with minimal effort.

Option A is incorrect because creating multiple endpoints for each model would incur more cost and complexity than using a single endpoint with multiple production variants. Moreover, controlling the invocation of different models at the application layer would require more custom logic and coordination than using the UpdateEndpointWeightsAndCapacities API. Option C is incorrect because Amazon SageMaker Neo is a service that allows users to optimize ML models for different hardware platforms, such as edge devices. It is not relevant to the problem of running multiple versions of a model in parallel for long periods of time. Option D is incorrect because Amazon SageMaker batch transform is a service that allows users to perform asynchronous inference on large datasets. It is not suitable for the problem of performing real-time inference on streaming data from device users.

References:

Deploying models to Amazon SageMaker hosting services - Amazon SageMaker

Update an Amazon SageMaker endpoint to accommodate new models - Amazon SageMaker

UpdateEndpointWeightsAndCapacities - Amazon SageMaker

Principal Component Analysis (PCA) is a dimensionality reduction technique that captures the variance within the feature space, helping to understand the directions in which data varies most. In SageMaker Data Wrangler, the multicollinearity measurement and PCA features allow the data scientist to analyze interdependencies between predictor variables while reducing redundancy. PCA transforms correlated features into a set of uncorrelated components, helping to simplify the dataset without significant loss of information, making it ideal for refining features based on variance.

Options A and D offer methods to understand feature relevance but are less effective for managing multicollinearity and variance representation in the data.

To leverage the NVIDIA GPUs on Amazon EC2 P3 instances for training a custom ResNet model using Amazon SageMaker, the Machine Learning Specialist needs to build the Docker container to be NVIDIA-Docker compatible. NVIDIA-Docker is a tool that enables GPU-accelerated containers to run on Docker. NVIDIA-Docker can automatically configure the Docker container with the necessary drivers, libraries, and environment variables to access the NVIDIA GPUs. NVIDIA-Docker can also isolate the GPU resources and ensure that each container has exclusive access to a GPU.

To build a Docker container that is NVIDIA-Docker compatible, the Machine Learning Specialist needs to follow these steps:

Install the NVIDIA Container Toolkit on the host machine that runs Docker. This toolkit includes the NVIDIA Container Runtime, which is a modified version of the Docker runtime that supports GPU hardware.

Use the base image provided by NVIDIA as the first line of the Dockerfile. The base image contains the NVIDIA drivers and CUDA toolkit that are required for GPU-accelerated applications. The base image can be specified as FROM nvcr.io/nvidia/cuda:tag, where tag is the version of CUDA and the operating system.

Install the required dependencies and frameworks for the ResNet model, such as PyTorch, torchvision, etc., in the Dockerfile.

Copy the ResNet model code and any other necessary files to the Docker container in the Dockerfile.

Build the Docker image using the docker build command.

Push the Docker image to a repository, such as Amazon Elastic Container Registry (Amazon ECR), using the docker push command.

Specify the Docker image URI and the instance type (ml.p3.xlarge) in the Amazon SageMaker CreateTrainingJob request body.

The other options are not valid or sufficient for building a Docker container that can leverage the NVIDIA GPUs on Amazon EC2 P3 instances. Bundling the NVIDIA drivers with the Docker image is not a good option, as it can cause driver conflicts and compatibility issues with the host machine and the NVIDIA GPUs. Organizing the Docker container’s file structure to execute on GPU instances is not a good option, as it does not ensure that the Docker container can access the NVIDIA GPUs and the CUDA toolkit. Setting the GPU flag in the Amazon SageMaker CreateTrainingJob request body is not a good option, as it does not apply to custom Docker containers, but only to built-in algorithms and frameworks that support GPU instances.

The solution that the data scientist should use to improve the performance of the model is to apply the Synthetic Minority Oversampling Technique (SMOTE) on the minority class in the training dataset, and retrain the model with the updated training data. This solution can address the problem of class imbalance in the dataset, which can affect the model’s ability to learn from the rare but important positive class (fraud).

Class imbalance is a common issue in machine learning, especially for classification tasks. It occurs when one class (usually the positive or target class) is significantly underrepresented in the dataset compared to the other class (usually the negative or non-target class). For example, in the credit card fraud detection problem, the positive class (fraud) is much less frequent than the negative class (fair transactions). This can cause the model to be biased towards the majority class, and fail to capture the characteristics and patterns of the minority class. As a result, the model may have a high overall accuracy, but a low recall or true positive rate for the minority class, which means it misses many fraudulent transactions.

SMOTE is a technique that can help mitigate the class imbalance problem by generating synthetic samples for the minority class. SMOTE works by finding the k-nearest neighbors of each minority class instance, and randomly creating new instances along the line segments connecting them. This way, SMOTE can increase the number and diversity of the minority class instances, without duplicating or losing any information. By applying SMOTE on the minority class in the training dataset, the data scientist can balance the classes and improve the model’s performance on the positive class1.

The other options are either ineffective or counterproductive. Applying SMOTE on the majority class would not balance the classes, but increase the imbalance and the size of the dataset. Undersampling the minority class would reduce the number of instances available for the model to learn from, and potentially lose some important information. Oversampling the majority class would also increase the imbalance and the size of the dataset, and introduce redundancy and overfitting.

References:

1: SMOTE for Imbalanced Classification with Python - Machine Learning Mastery

For a repository containing a large and dynamically scaling collection of images, Amazon S3 is ideal due to its scalability and versioning capabilities. Amazon S3 natively supports automatic scaling to accommodate increasing storage needs and allows versioning, which enables tracking and managing different versions of objects.

To meet the requirement of maintaining multiple, immediately accessible copies of data across AWS Regions, S3 Cross-Region Replication (CRR) can be enabled. CRR automatically replicates new or updated objects to a specified destination bucket in another AWS Region, ensuring low-latency access and disaster recovery. By setting up CRR with versioning enabled, the data scientist can achieve a multi-Region, scalable, and version-controlled repository in Amazon S3.

 The best feature engineering strategy for this scenario is to apply dimensionality reduction by using the principal component analysis (PCA) algorithm. PCA is a technique that transforms a large set of correlated features into a smaller set of uncorrelated features called principal components. This can help reduce the complexity and noise in the data, improve the performance and interpretability of the model, and avoid overfitting. Amazon SageMaker provides a built-in PCA algorithm that can be used to perform dimensionality reduction on tabular data. The ML specialist can use Amazon SageMaker to train and deploy the PCA model, and then use the output of the PCA model as the input for the classification model.

References:

Dimensionality Reduction with Amazon SageMaker

Amazon SageMaker PCA Algorithm

 The best feature engineering technique to speed up the model training time without losing a lot of information from the original dataset is to use an autoencoder or principal component analysis (PCA) to replace original features with new features. An autoencoder is a type of neural network that learns a compressed representation of the input data, called the latent space, by minimizing the reconstruction error between the input and the output. PCA is a statistical technique that reduces the dimensionality of the data by finding a set of orthogonal axes, called the principal components, that capture the maximum variance of the data. Both techniques can help reduce the number of features and remove the noise and redundancy in the data, which can improve the model performance and speed up the training process. References:

AWS Machine Learning Specialty Exam Guide

AWS Machine Learning Training - Dimensionality Reduction for Machine Learning

AWS Machine Learning Training - Deep Learning with Amazon SageMaker

 A precision-recall curve is a plot that shows the trade-off between the precision and recall of a binary classifier as the decision threshold is varied. It is a useful tool for evaluating and comparing the performance of different models. To generate a precision-recall curve, the following steps are needed:

Calculate the precision and recall values for different threshold values using the predictions and the true labels of the data.

Plot the precision values on the y-axis and the recall values on the x-axis for each threshold value.

Optionally, calculate the area under the curve (AUC) as a summary metric of the model performance.

Among the four options, option C requires the least coding effort to generate and share a visualization of the daily precision-recall curve from the predictions. This option involves the following steps:

Run a daily Amazon EMR workflow to generate precision-recall data: Amazon EMR is a service that allows running big data frameworks, such as Apache Spark, on a managed cluster of EC2 instances. Amazon EMR can handle large-scale data processing and analysis, such as calculating the precision and recall values for different threshold values from 100 TB of predictions. Amazon EMR supports various languages, such as Python, Scala, and R, for writing the code to perform the calculations. Amazon EMR also supports scheduling workflows using Apache Airflow or AWS Step Functions, which can automate the daily execution of the code.

Save the results in Amazon S3: Amazon S3 is a service that provides scalable, durable, and secure object storage. Amazon S3 can store the precision-recall data generated by Amazon EMR in a cost-effective and accessible way. Amazon S3 supports various data formats, such as CSV, JSON, or Parquet, for storing the data. Amazon S3 also integrates with other AWS services, such as Amazon QuickSight, for further processing and visualization of the data.

Visualize the arrays in Amazon QuickSight: Amazon QuickSight is a service that provides fast, easy-to-use, and interactive business intelligence and data visualization. Amazon QuickSight can connect to Amazon S3 as a data source and import the precision-recall data into a dataset. Amazon QuickSight can then create a line chart to plot the precision-recall curve from the dataset. Amazon QuickSight also supports calculating the AUC and adding it as an annotation to the chart.

Publish them in a dashboard shared with the Business team: Amazon QuickSight allows creating and publishing dashboards that contain one or more visualizations from the datasets. Amazon QuickSight also allows sharing the dashboards with other users or groups within the same AWS account or across different AWS accounts. The Business team can access the dashboard with read-only permissions and view the daily precision-recall curve from the predictions.

The other options require more coding effort than option C for the following reasons:

Option A: This option requires writing code to plot the precision-recall curve from the data stored in Amazon S3, as well as creating a mechanism to share the plot with the Business team. This can involve using additional libraries or tools, such as matplotlib, seaborn, or plotly, for creating the plot, and using email, web, or cloud services, such as AWS Lambda or Amazon SNS, for sharing the plot.

Option B: This option requires transforming the predictions into a format that Amazon QuickSight can recognize and import as a data source, such as CSV, JSON, or Parquet. This can involve writing code to process and convert the predictions, as well as uploading them to a storage service, such as Amazon S3 or Amazon Redshift, that Amazon QuickSight can connect to.

Option D: This option requires writing code to generate precision-recall data in Amazon ES, as well as creating a dashboard to visualize the data. Amazon ES is a service that provides a fully managed Elasticsearch cluster, which is mainly used for search and analytics purposes. Amazon ES is not designed for generating precision-recall data, and it requires using a specific data format, such as JSON, for storing the data. Amazon ES also requires using a tool, such as Kibana, for creating and sharing the dashboard, which can involve additional configuration and customization steps.

References:

Precision-Recall

What Is Amazon EMR?

What Is Amazon S3?

[What Is Amazon QuickSight?]

[What Is Amazon Elasticsearch Service?]

The SageMaker CreatePresignedDomainUrl API is the best option to meet the requirements of the company. This API creates a URL for a specified UserProfile in a Domain. When accessed in a web browser, the user will be automatically signed in to the domain, and granted access to all of the Apps and files associated with the Domain’s Amazon Elastic File System (EFS) volume. This API can only be called when the authentication mode equals IAM, which means the company can use its existing IdP to authenticate users. The company can use the DynamoDB table to store the domain IDs and user profile names for each department, and use the proxy application to query the table and generate the presigned URL for the appropriate domain according to the user’s credentials. The presigned URL is valid only for a specified duration, which can be set by the SessionExpirationDurationInSeconds parameter. This can help enhance the security and prevent unauthorized access to the domains.

The other options are not suitable for the company’s requirements. The SageMaker CreateHumanTaskUi API is used to define the settings for the human review workflow user interface, which is not related to accessing the SageMaker Studio domains. The SageMaker ListHumanTaskUis API is used to return information about the human task user interfaces in the account, which is also not relevant to the company’s use case. The SageMaker CreatePresignedNotebookInstanceUrl API is used to create a URL to connect to the Jupyter server from a notebook instance, which is different from accessing the SageMaker Studio domain.

References:

•CreatePresignedDomainUrl

•CreatePresignedNotebookInstanceUrl

•CreateHumanTaskUi

•ListHumanTaskUis

Feature selection is the process of reducing the number of input variables to those that are most relevant for predicting the target variable. One way to do this is to run a correlation check of all features against the target variable and remove features with low target variable correlation scores. This means that these features have little or no linear relationship with the target variable and are not useful for the prediction. This can reduce the model’s complexity and improve its performance. References:

Feature engineering - Machine Learning Lens

Feature Selection For Machine Learning in Python

The solution D is the best data visualization approach to determine the optimal value of k for the k-means clustering algorithm. The solution D involves the following steps:

Run the k-means clustering algorithm for a range of k. For each value of k, calculate the sum of squared errors (SSE). The SSE is a measure of how well the clusters fit the data. It is calculated by summing the squared distances of each data point to its closest cluster center. A lower SSE indicates a better fit, but it will always decrease as the number of clusters increases. Therefore, the goal is to find the smallest value of k that still has a low SSE1.

Plot a line chart of the SSE for each value of k. The line chart will show how the SSE changes as the value of k increases. Typically, the line chart will have a shape of an elbow, where the SSE drops rapidly at first and then levels off. The optimal value of k is the point after which the curve starts decreasing in a linear fashion. This point is also known as the elbow point, and it represents the balance between the number of clusters and the SSE1.

The other options are not suitable because:

Option A: Calculating the principal component analysis (PCA) components, running the k-means clustering algorithm for a range of k by using only the first two PCA components, and creating a scatter plot with a different color for each cluster will not accurately determine the optimal value of k. PCA is a technique that reduces the dimensionality of the data by transforming it into a new set of features that capture the most variance in the data. However, PCA may not preserve the original structure and distances of the data, and it may lose some information in the process. Therefore, running the k-means clustering algorithm on the PCA components may not reflect the true clusters in the data. Moreover, using only the first two PCA components may not capture enough variance to represent the data well. Furthermore, creating a scatter plot may not be reliable, as it depends on the subjective judgment of the data scientist to decide when the clusters look reasonably separated2.

Option B: Calculating the PCA components and creating a line plot of the number of components against the explained variance will not determine the optimal value of k. This approach is used to determine the optimal number of PCA components to use for dimensionality reduction, not for clustering. The explained variance is the ratio of the variance of each PCA component to the total variance of the data. The optimal number of PCA components is the point where adding more components does not significantly increase the explained variance. However, this number may not correspond to the optimal number of clusters, as PCA and k-means clustering have different objectives and assumptions2.

Option C: Creating a t-distributed stochastic neighbor embedding (t-SNE) plot for a range of perplexity values will not determine the optimal value of k. t-SNE is a technique that reduces the dimensionality of the data by embedding it into a lower-dimensional space, such as a two-dimensional plane. t-SNE preserves the local structure and distances of the data, and it can reveal clusters and patterns in the data. However, t-SNE does not assign labels or centroids to the clusters, and it does not provide a measure of how well the clusters fit the data. Therefore, t-SNE cannot determine the optimal number of clusters, as it only visualizes the data. Moreover, t-SNE depends on the perplexity parameter, which is a measure of how many neighbors each point considers. The perplexity parameter can affect the shape and size of the clusters, and there is no optimal value for it. Therefore, creating a t-SNE plot for a range of perplexity values may not be consistent or reliable3.

References:

1: How to Determine the Optimal K for K-Means?

2: Principal Component Analysis

3: t-Distributed Stochastic Neighbor Embedding

The best options to use an Inception neural network architecture instead of a ResNet architecture for image classification in Amazon SageMaker are:

Bundle a Docker container with TensorFlow Estimator loaded with an Inception network and use this for model training. This option allows users to customize the training environment and use any TensorFlow model they want. Users can create a Docker image that contains the TensorFlow Estimator API and the Inception model from the TensorFlow Hub, and push it to Amazon ECR. Then, users can use the SageMaker Estimator class to train the model using the custom Docker image and the training data from Amazon S3.

Use custom code in Amazon SageMaker with TensorFlow Estimator to load the model with an Inception network and use this for model training. This option allows users to use the built-in TensorFlow container provided by SageMaker and write custom code to load and train the Inception model. Users can use the TensorFlow Estimator class to specify the custom code and the training data from Amazon S3. The custom code can use the TensorFlow Hub module to load the Inception model and fine-tune it on the training data.

The other options are not feasible for this scenario because:

Customize the built-in image classification algorithm to use Inception and use this for model training. This option is not possible because the built-in image classification algorithm in SageMaker does not support customizing the neural network architecture. The built-in algorithm only supports ResNet models with different depths and widths.

Create a support case with the SageMaker team to change the default image classification algorithm to Inception. This option is not realistic because the SageMaker team does not provide such a service. Users cannot request the SageMaker team to change the default algorithm or add new algorithms to the built-in ones.

Download and apt-get install the inception network code into an Amazon EC2 instance and use this instance as a Jupyter notebook in Amazon SageMaker. This option is not advisable because it does not leverage the benefits of SageMaker, such as managed training and deployment, distributed training, and automatic model tuning. Users would have to manually install and configure the Inception network code and the TensorFlow framework on the EC2 instance, and run the training and inference code on the same instance, which may not be optimal for performance and scalability.

References:

Use Your Own Algorithms or Models with Amazon SageMaker

Use the SageMaker TensorFlow Serving Container

TensorFlow Hub

 The best strategy to identify fraudulent accounts is to create a FindMatches machine learning transform in AWS Glue. The FindMatches transform enables you to identify duplicate or matching records in your dataset, even when the records do not have a common unique identifier and no fields match exactly. This can help you improve fraud detection by finding accounts that are associated with a previously known fraudulent user. You can teach the FindMatches transform your definition of a “duplicate” or a “match” through examples, and it will use machine learning to identify other potential duplicates or matches in your dataset. You can then use the FindMatches transform in your AWS Glue ETL jobs to cleanse your data.

Option A is incorrect because there is no built-in FindDuplicates Amazon Athena query. Amazon Athena is an interactive query service that makes it easy to analyze data in Amazon S3 using standard SQL. However, Amazon Athena does not provide a predefined query to find duplicate records in a dataset. You would have to write your own SQL query to perform this task, which might not be as effective or accurate as using the FindMatches transform.

Option C is incorrect because creating an AWS Glue crawler to infer duplicate accounts in the source data is not a valid strategy. An AWS Glue crawler is a program that connects to a data store, progresses through a prioritized list of classifiers to determine the schema for your data, and then creates metadata tables in the AWS Glue Data Catalog. A crawler does not perform any data cleansing or record matching tasks.

Option D is incorrect because searching for duplicate accounts in the AWS Glue Data Catalog is not a feasible strategy. The AWS Glue Data Catalog is a central repository to store structural and operational metadata for your data assets. The Data Catalog does not store the actual data, but rather the metadata that describes where the data is located, how it is formatted, and what it contains. Therefore, you cannot search for duplicate records in the Data Catalog.

References:

Record matching with AWS Lake Formation FindMatches - AWS Glue

Amazon Athena – Interactive SQL Queries for Data in Amazon S3

AWS Glue Crawlers - AWS Glue

AWS Glue Data Catalog - AWS Glue

Amazon Personalize is a managed AWS service specifically designed to deliver personalized recommendations with minimal development time. It uses machine learning algorithms tailored for recommendation systems, making it highly suitable for applications where quick integration is essential. By using Amazon Personalize, the company can leverage existing customer data to generate real-time, personalized product recommendations that align better with customer preferences, enhancing the likelihood of customer engagement with recommended items.

Options involving EC2 instances with GPU or accelerated computing primarily enhance computational performance but do not inherently improve recommendation relevance, while Amazon SageMaker would require more development effort to achieve similar results.

The best option is to use the event tracker in Amazon Personalize to include real-time user interactions. This will allow the model to learn from the feedback of the customers during the marketing campaign and adjust the recommendations accordingly. The event tracker can capture click-through, add-to-cart, purchase, and other types of events that indicate the user’s preferences. By using the event tracker, the company can improve the relevance and freshness of the recommendations and avoid the decrease in sales.

The other options are not as effective as using the event tracker. Adding user metadata and using the HRNN-Metadata recipe in Amazon Personalize can help capture the user’s attributes and preferences, but it will not reflect the changes in user behavior during the marketing campaign. Implementing a new solution using the built-in factorization machines (FM) algorithm in Amazon SageMaker can also provide personalized recommendations, but it will require more time and effort to train and deploy the model. Adding event type and event value fields to the interactions dataset in Amazon Personalize can help capture the importance and context of each interaction, but it will not update the model with the latest user feedback.

References:

Recording events - Amazon Personalize

Using real-time events - Amazon Personalize

A neural network pre-trained on ImageNet is a deep learning model that has been trained on a large dataset of images containing 1000 classes of objects. The model can learn to extract high-level features from the images that capture the semantic and visual information of the objects. The penultimate layer of the model is the layer before the final output layer, and it contains a feature vector that represents the input image in a lower-dimensional space. By running images through a pre-trained neural network and collecting the feature vectors from the penultimate layer, the Specialist can obtain relevant numerical representations that can be used for nearest-neighbor searches. The feature vectors can capture the similarity between images based on the presence and appearance of similar objects, and they can be compared using distance metrics such as Euclidean distance or cosine similarity. This approach can enable the recommendation engine to show a picture that captures similar objects to a given picture.

References:

ImageNet - Wikipedia

How to use a pre-trained neural network to extract features from images | by Rishabh Anand | Analytics Vidhya | Medium

Image Similarity using Deep Ranking | by Aditya Oke | Towards Data Science

The solution C is the most likely to improve the data ingestion rate into Amazon S3 because it increases the number of shards for the data stream. The number of shards determines the throughput capacity of the data stream, which affects the rate of data ingestion. Each shard can support up to 1 MB per second of data input and 2 MB per second of data output. By increasing the number of shards, the company can increase the data ingestion rate proportionally. The company can use the UpdateShardCount API operation to modify the number of shards in the data stream1.

The other options are not likely to improve the data ingestion rate into Amazon S3 because:

Option A: Increasing the number of S3 prefixes for the delivery stream to write to will not affect the data ingestion rate, as it only changes the way the data is organized in the S3 bucket. The number of S3 prefixes can help to optimize the performance of downstream applications that read the data from S3, but it does not impact the performance of Kinesis Data Firehose2.

Option B: Decreasing the retention period for the data stream will not affect the data ingestion rate, as it only changes the amount of time the data is stored in the data stream. The retention period can help to manage the data availability and durability, but it does not impact the throughput capacity of the data stream3.

Option D: Adding more consumers using the Kinesis Client Library (KCL) will not affect the data ingestion rate, as it only changes the way the data is processed by downstream applications. The consumers can help to scale the data processing and handle failures, but they do not impact the data ingestion into S3 by Kinesis Data Firehose4.

References:

1: Resharding - Amazon Kinesis Data Streams

2: Amazon S3 Prefixes - Amazon Kinesis Data Firehose

3: Data Retention - Amazon Kinesis Data Streams

4: Developing Consumers Using the Kinesis Client Library - Amazon Kinesis Data Streams

A VPC endpoint is a logical device that enables private connections between a VPC and supported AWS services. A VPC endpoint can be either a gateway endpoint or an interface endpoint. A gateway endpoint is a gateway that is a target for a specified route in the route table, used for traffic destined to a supported AWS service. An interface endpoint is an elastic network interface with a private IP address that serves as an entry point for traffic destined to a supported service1

In this case, the Machine Learning Specialist can create a gateway endpoint for Amazon S3, which is a supported service for gateway endpoints. A gateway endpoint for Amazon S3 enables the VPC to access Amazon S3 privately, without requiring an internet gateway, NAT device, VPN connection, or AWS Direct Connect connection. The traffic between the VPC and Amazon S3 does not leave the Amazon network2

To restrict access to the dataset stored in Amazon S3, the Machine Learning Specialist can apply a bucket access policy that allows access only from the given VPC endpoint and the VPC. A bucket access policy is a resource-based policy that defines who can access a bucket and what actions they can perform. A bucket access policy can use various conditions to control access, such as the source IP address, the source VPC, the source VPC endpoint, etc. In this case, the Machine Learning Specialist can use the aws:sourceVpce condition to specify the ID of the VPC endpoint, and the aws:sourceVpc condition to specify the ID of the VPC. This way, only the requests that originate from the VPC endpoint or the VPC can access the bucket that contains the dataset34

The other options are not valid or secure ways to satisfy the requirements. Creating a VPC endpoint and applying a bucket access policy that allows access from the given VPC endpoint and an Amazon EC2 instance is not a good option, as it does not restrict access to the VPC. An Amazon EC2 instance is a virtual server that runs in the AWS cloud. An Amazon EC2 instance can have a public IP address or a private IP address, depending on the network configuration. Allowing access from an Amazon EC2 instance does not guarantee that the instance is in the same VPC as the VPC endpoint, and may expose the dataset to unauthorized access. Creating a VPC endpoint and using Network Access Control Lists (NACLs) to allow traffic between only the given VPC endpoint and an Amazon EC2 instance is not a good option, as it does not restrict access to the VPC. NACLs are stateless firewalls that can control inbound and outbound traffic at the subnet level. NACLs can use rules to allow or deny traffic based on the protocol, port, and source or destination IP address. However, NACLs do not support VPC endpoints as a source or destination, and cannot filter traffic based on the VPC endpoint ID or the VPC ID. Therefore, using NACLs does not guarantee that the traffic is from the VPC endpoint or the VPC, and may expose the dataset to unauthorized access. Creating a VPC endpoint and using security groups to restrict access to the given VPC endpoint and an Amazon EC2 instance is not a good option, as it does not restrict access to the VPC. Security groups are stateful firewalls that can control inbound and outbound traffic at the instance level. Security groups can use rules to allow or deny traffic based on the protocol, port, and source or destination. However, security groups do not support VPC endpoints as a source or destination, and cannot filter traffic based on the VPC endpoint ID or the VPC ID. Therefore, using security groups does not guarantee that the traffic is from the VPC endpoint or the VPC, and may expose the dataset to unauthorized access.

 To use a custom algorithm in Amazon SageMaker, the Docker container image must have an executable file named train that acts as the ENTRYPOINT for the container. This file is responsible for running the training code and communicating with the Amazon SageMaker service. The train file must be in the PATH of the container and have execute permissions. The other options are not valid ways to package the Docker container for Amazon SageMaker. References:

Use Docker containers to build models - Amazon SageMaker

Create a container with your own algorithms and models - Amazon SageMaker

Multiple imputation is a technique that uses machine learning to generate multiple plausible values for each missing value in a dataset, based on the observed data and the relationships among the variables. Multiple imputation preserves the integrity of the dataset by accounting for the uncertainty and variability of the missing data, and avoids the bias and loss of information that may result from other methods, such as listwise deletion, last observation carried forward, or mean substitution. Multiple imputation can improve the accuracy and validity of statistical analysis and machine learning models that use the imputed dataset. References:

Managing missing values in your target and related datasets with automated imputation support in Amazon Forecast

Imputation by feature importance (IBFI): A methodology to impute missing data in large datasets

Multiple Imputation by Chained Equations (MICE) Explained

The best solution to verify the suitability of an ARIMA approach is to use Amazon SageMaker Data Wrangler. Data Wrangler is a feature of SageMaker Studio that provides an end-to-end solution for importing, preparing, transforming, featurizing, and analyzing data. Data Wrangler includes built-in analyses that help generate visualizations and data insights in a few clicks. One of the built-in analyses is the Seasonal-Trend decomposition, which can be used to decompose a time series into its trend, seasonal, and residual components. This analysis can help the developer understand the patterns and characteristics of the time series, such as stationarity, seasonality, and autocorrelation, which are important for choosing an appropriate ARIMA model. Data Wrangler also provides built-in transformations that can help the developer handle missing data, such as imputing with mean, median, mode, or constant values, or dropping rows with missing values. Imputing missing data can help avoid gaps and irregularities in the time series, which can affect the ARIMA model performance. Data Wrangler also allows the developer to export the prepared data and the analysis code to various destinations, such as SageMaker Processing, SageMaker Pipelines, or SageMaker Feature Store, for further processing and modeling.

The other options are not suitable for verifying the suitability of an ARIMA approach. Amazon SageMaker Autopilot is a feature-set that automates key tasks of an automatic machine learning (AutoML) process. It explores the data, selects the algorithms relevant to the problem type, and prepares the data to facilitate model training and tuning. However, Autopilot does not support ARIMA as a machine learning problem type, and it does not provide any visualization or analysis of the time series data. Resampling data by using the aggregate daily total can reduce the granularity and resolution of the time series, which can affect the ARIMA model accuracy and applicability.

References:

•Analyze and Visualize

•Transform and Export

•Amazon SageMaker Autopilot

•ARIMA Model – Complete Guide to Time Series Forecasting in Python

The best solution is to configure Amazon EventBridge to run a predefined SageMaker pipeline to perform the transformations when a new data is detected in the S3 bucket. This solution requires the least development effort because it leverages the native integration between EventBridge and SageMaker Pipelines, which allows you to trigger a pipeline execution based on an event rule. EventBridge can monitor the S3 bucket for new data uploads and invoke the pipeline that contains the same transformations and feature engineering steps that were defined in SageMaker Data Wrangler. The pipeline can then ingest the transformed data into the online feature store for training and inference.

The other solutions are less optimal because they require more development effort and additional services. Using AWS Lambda or AWS Step Functions would require writing custom code to invoke the SageMaker pipeline and handle any errors or retries. Using Apache Airflow would require setting up and maintaining an Airflow server and DAGs, as well as integrating with the SageMaker API.

References:

Amazon EventBridge and Amazon SageMaker Pipelines integration

Create a pipeline using a JSON specification

Ingest data into a feature group

The SageMaker Variant Invocations Per Instance setting is the target value for the average number of invocations per instance per minute for the model variant. It is used by the automatic scaling policy to add or remove instances to keep the metric close to the specified value. To determine this value, the following equation can be used in combination with load testing:

SageMakerVariantInvocationsPerInstance = (MAX_RPS * SAFETY_FACTOR) * 60

Where MAX_RPS is the maximum requests per second that the model variant can handle without service degradation, SAFETY_FACTOR is a factor that ensures that the clients do not exceed the maximum RPS, and 60 is the conversion factor from seconds to minutes. In this case, the given parameters are:

MAX_RPS = 20 SAFETY_FACTOR = 0.5

Plugging these values into the equation, we get:

SageMakerVariantInvocationsPerInstance = (20 * 0.5) * 60 SageMakerVariantInvocationsPerInstance = 600

Therefore, the Specialist should set the SageMaker Variant Invocations Per Instance setting to 600.

References:

Load testing your auto scaling configuration - Amazon SageMaker

Configure model auto scaling with the console - Amazon SageMaker

 In this scenario, the specialist should use one-hot encoding and RGB encoding to allow the regression model to learn from the Wall_Color data. One-hot encoding is a technique used to convert categorical data into numerical data. It creates new columns that store one-hot representation of colors. For example, a variable named color has three categories: red, green, and blue. After one-hot encoding, the new variables should be like this:

One-hot encoding can capture the presence or absence of a color, but it cannot capture the intensity or hue of a color. RGB encoding is a technique used to represent colors in a digital image. It creates three columns to encode the color in RGB format. For example, a variable named color has three categories: red, green, and blue. After RGB encoding, the new variables should be like this:

RGB encoding can capture the intensity and hue of a color, but it may also introduce correlation among the three columns. Therefore, using both one-hot encoding and RGB encoding can provide more information to the regression model than using either one alone.

References:

Feature Engineering for Categorical Data

How to Perform Feature Selection with Categorical Data

 Amazon EMR is a service that can process large amounts of data efficiently and cost-effectively. It can run distributed frameworks such as Apache Spark, which can perform feature engineering on big data. Amazon SageMaker SDK is a Python library that can interact with Amazon SageMaker service to train and deploy machine learning models. It can also use Amazon EMR as a data source for training data. References:

Amazon EMR

Amazon SageMaker SDK

 A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve is a model evaluation technique that can be used to understand how different classification thresholds will impact the model’s performance. A ROC curve plots the true positive rate (TPR) against the false positive rate (FPR) for various values of the classification threshold. The TPR, also known as sensitivity or recall, is the proportion of positive instances that are correctly classified as positive. The FPR, also known as the fall-out, is the proportion of negative instances that are incorrectly classified as positive. A ROC curve can show the trade-off between the TPR and the FPR for different thresholds, and help the Machine Learning Specialist to select the optimal threshold that maximizes the TPR and minimizes the FPR. A ROC curve can also be used to compare the performance of different models by calculating the area under the curve (AUC), which is a measure of how well the model can distinguish between the positive and negative classes. A higher AUC indicates a better model

To count the number of students who are in a class, the solution needs to detect and locate each student in the video frame. Object detection is a computer vision model that can identify and locate multiple objects in an image. To differentiate students who are performing a stretch correctly from students who are performing a stretch incorrectly, the solution needs to measure the location and angle of each student’s arms and legs. Pose estimation is a computer vision model that can estimate the pose of a person by detecting the position and orientation of key body parts. Image classification, OCR, and image GANs are not relevant for this use case. References:

Object Detection: A computer vision technique that identifies and locates objects within an image or video.

Pose Estimation: A computer vision technique that estimates the pose of a person by detecting the position and orientation of key body parts.

Amazon SageMaker: A fully managed service that provides every developer and data scientist with the ability to build, train, and deploy machine learning (ML) models quickly.

B. Apply principal component analysis (PCA): PCA is a technique that reduces the dimensionality of a dataset by transforming the original features into a smaller set of new features that capture most of the variance in the data. PCA can help address the issue of multicollinearity, which occurs when some features are highly correlated with each other and can cause problems for some machine learning algorithms. By applying PCA, the data engineer can reduce the number of features and remove the redundancy in the data.

C. Remove a portion of highly correlated features from the dataset: Another way to deal with multicollinearity is to manually remove some of the features that are highly correlated with each other. This can help simplify the model and avoid overfitting. The data engineer can use the correlation matrix to identify the features that have a high correlation coefficient (e.g., above 0.8 or below -0.8) and remove one of them from the dataset. References: =

Principal Component Analysis: This is a document from AWS that explains what PCA is, how it works, and how to use it with Amazon SageMaker.

Multicollinearity: This is a document from AWS that describes what multicollinearity is, how to detect it, and how to deal with it.

Amazon Kinesis Data Firehose is a fully managed service that can capture, transform, and load streaming data into AWS data stores, such as Amazon S3, Amazon Redshift, Amazon Elasticsearch Service, and Splunk. It can also invoke AWS Lambda functions to perform custom transformations on the data. Amazon Kinesis Data Analytics is a service that can analyze streaming data in real time using SQL or Apache Flink applications. It can also use machine learning algorithms, such as Random Cut Forest (RCF), to perform anomaly detection on streaming data. RCF is an unsupervised learning algorithm that assigns an anomaly score to each data point based on how different it is from the rest of the data. By using Kinesis Data Firehose and Kinesis Data Analytics, the cybersecurity company can ingest the data in real time, score the malicious events as anomalies, and stream the results to Amazon S3, which can serve as a data lake for later processing and analysis. This is the most efficient way to accomplish these tasks, as it does not require any additional infrastructure, coding, or training.

References:

Amazon Kinesis Data Firehose - Amazon Web Services

Amazon Kinesis Data Analytics - Amazon Web Services

Anomaly Detection with Amazon Kinesis Data Analytics - Amazon Web Services

[AWS Certified Machine Learning - Specialty Sample Questions]

Using AWS Glue to catalogue the data and Amazon Athena to run queries is the solution that requires the least effort to be able to query the data stored in an Amazon S3 bucket using SQL. AWS Glue is a service that provides a serverless data integration platform for data preparation and transformation. AWS Glue can automatically discover, crawl, and catalogue the data stored in various sources, such as Amazon S3, Amazon RDS, Amazon Redshift, etc. AWS Glue can also use AWS KMS to encrypt the data at rest on the Glue Data Catalog and Glue ETL jobs. AWS Glue can handle both structured and unstructured data, and support various data formats, such as CSV, JSON, Parquet, etc. AWS Glue can also use built-in or custom classifiers to identify and parse the data schema and format1 Amazon Athena is a service that provides an interactive query engine that can run SQL queries directly on data stored in Amazon S3. Amazon Athena can integrate with AWS Glue to use the Glue Data Catalog as a central metadata repository for the data sources and tables. Amazon Athena can also use AWS KMS to encrypt the data at rest on Amazon S3 and the query results. Amazon Athena can query both structured and unstructured data, and support various data formats, such as CSV, JSON, Parquet, etc. Amazon Athena can also use partitions and compression to optimize the query performance and reduce the query cost23

The other options are not valid or require more effort to query the data stored in an Amazon S3 bucket using SQL. Using AWS Data Pipeline to transform the data and Amazon RDS to run queries is not a good option, as it involves moving the data from Amazon S3 to Amazon RDS, which can incur additional time and cost. AWS Data Pipeline is a service that can orchestrate and automate data movement and transformation across various AWS services and on-premises data sources. AWS Data Pipeline can be integrated with Amazon EMR to run ETL jobs on the data stored in Amazon S3. Amazon RDS is a service that provides a managed relational database service that can run various database engines, such as MySQL, PostgreSQL, Oracle, etc. Amazon RDS can use AWS KMS to encrypt the data at rest and in transit. Amazon RDS can run SQL queries on the data stored in the database tables45 Using AWS Batch to run ETL on the data and Amazon Aurora to run the queries is not a good option, as it also involves moving the data from Amazon S3 to Amazon Aurora, which can incur additional time and cost. AWS Batch is a service that can run batch computing workloads on AWS. AWS Batch can be integrated with AWS Lambda to trigger ETL jobs on the data stored in Amazon S3. Amazon Aurora is a service that provides a compatible and scalable relational database engine that can run MySQL or PostgreSQL. Amazon Aurora can use AWS KMS to encrypt the data at rest and in transit. Amazon Aurora can run SQL queries on the data stored in the database tables. Using AWS Lambda to transform the data and Amazon Kinesis Data Analytics to run queries is not a good option, as it is not suitable for querying data stored in Amazon S3 using SQL. AWS Lambda is a service that can run serverless functions on AWS. AWS Lambda can be integrated with Amazon S3 to trigger data transformation functions on the data stored in Amazon S3. Amazon Kinesis Data Analytics is a service that can analyze streaming data using SQL or Apache Flink. Amazon Kinesis Data Analytics can be integrated with Amazon Kinesis Data Streams or Amazon Kinesis Data Firehose to ingest streaming data sources, such as web logs, social media, IoT devices, etc. Amazon Kinesis Data Analytics is not designed for querying data stored in Amazon S3 using SQL.

The best way to fix the problem without changing the Lambda code or data in DynamoDB is to add the unrecognized words as synonyms in the custom slot type. This way, Amazon Lex can resolve the synonyms to the corresponding slot values and pass them to the Lambda function. For example, if the slot type has a value “comedy” with synonyms “funny”, “fun”, and “humor”, then any of these words entered by the user will be resolved to “comedy” and the Lambda function can query the DynamoDB table for the book titles in that category. Adding synonyms to the custom slot type can be done easily using the Amazon Lex console or API, and does not require any code changes.

The other options are not correct because:

Option A: Adding the unrecognized words in the enumeration values list as new values in the slot type would not fix the problem, because the Lambda function and the DynamoDB table are not aware of these new values. The Lambda function would not be able to query the DynamoDB table for the book titles in the new categories, and the request would still fail. Moreover, adding new values to the slot type would increase the complexity and maintenance of the chatbot, as the Lambda function and the DynamoDB table would have to be updated accordingly.

Option B: Creating a new custom slot type, adding the unrecognized words to this slot type as enumeration values, and using this slot type for the slot would also not fix the problem, for the same reasons as option A. The Lambda function and the DynamoDB table would not be able to handle the new slot type and its values, and the request would still fail. Furthermore, creating a new slot type would require more effort and time than adding synonyms to the existing slot type.

Option C: Using the AMAZON.SearchQuery built-in slot types for custom searches in the database is not a suitable approach for this use case. The AMAZON.SearchQuery slot type is used to capture free-form user input that corresponds to a search query. However, this slot type does not perform any validation or resolution of the user input, and passes the raw input to the Lambda function. This means that the Lambda function would have to handle the logic of parsing and matching the user input to the DynamoDB table, which would require changing the Lambda code and adding more complexity to the solution.

References:

Custom slot type - Amazon Lex

Using Synonyms - Amazon Lex

Built-in Slot Types - Amazon Lex

Amazon CloudWatch is a service that can monitor and collect various metrics and logs from AWS resources, such as Amazon SageMaker. Amazon CloudWatch can also generate dashboards to create a single view for the metrics and logs that are of interest. By using Amazon CloudWatch, the Machine Learning Specialist can review the latency, memory utilization, and CPU utilization during the load test, as these are some of the metrics that are outputted by Amazon SageMaker. The Specialist can create a custom dashboard that displays these metrics in different widgets, such as graphs, tables, or text. The dashboard can also be configured to refresh automatically and show the latest data as the load test is running. This approach will allow the Specialist to monitor the performance and resource utilization of the model variant and adjust the Auto Scaling configuration accordingly.

References:

[Monitoring Amazon SageMaker with Amazon CloudWatch - Amazon SageMaker]

[Using Amazon CloudWatch Dashboards - Amazon CloudWatch]

[Create a CloudWatch Dashboard - Amazon CloudWatch]

The combination of steps that the ML engineer should take to train the model are to create a .lst file that contains a list of image files and corresponding class labels, upload the .lst file to Amazon S3, and initiate transfer learning by training the model using the images of less common species. This approach will allow the ML engineer to leverage the existing ImageNetV2 CNN model and fine-tune it with the new data using Pipe mode in SageMaker.

A .lst file is a text file that contains a list of image files and corresponding class labels, separated by tabs. The .lst file format is required for using the SageMaker image classification algorithm with Pipe mode. Pipe mode is a feature of SageMaker that enables streaming data directly from Amazon S3 to the training instances, without downloading the data first. Pipe mode can reduce the startup time, improve the I/O throughput, and enable training on large datasets that exceed the disk size limit. To use Pipe mode, the ML engineer needs to upload the .lst file to Amazon S3 and specify the S3 path as the input data channel for the training job1.

Transfer learning is a technique that enables reusing a pre-trained model for a new task by fine-tuning the model parameters with new data. Transfer learning can save time and computational resources, as well as improve the performance of the model, especially when the new task is similar to the original task. The SageMaker image classification algorithm supports transfer learning by allowing the ML engineer to specify the number of output classes and the number of layers to be retrained. The ML engineer can use the existing ImageNetV2 CNN model, which is trained on 1,000 classes of common objects, and fine-tune it with the new data of less common animal species, which is a similar task2.

The other options are either less effective or not supported by the SageMaker image classification algorithm. Using a ResNet model and initiating full training mode would require training the model from scratch, which would take more time and resources than transfer learning. Using an Inception model is not possible, as the SageMaker image classification algorithm only supports ResNet and ImageNetV2 models. Using an augmented manifest file in JSON Lines format is not compatible with Pipe mode, as Pipe mode only supports .lst files for image classification1.

References:

1: Using Pipe input mode for Amazon SageMaker algorithms | AWS Machine Learning Blog

2: Image Classification Algorithm - Amazon SageMaker

The best approach to identify and visualize the natural groupings for the numerical columns across all customers is to embed the numerical features using the t-distributed stochastic neighbor embedding (t-SNE) algorithm and create a scatter plot. t-SNE is a dimensionality reduction technique that can project high-dimensional data into a lower-dimensional space, while preserving the local structure and distances of the data points. A scatter plot can then show the clusters of data points in the reduced space, where each point represents a customer and the color indicates the cluster membership. This approach can help the Specialist quickly explore the patterns and similarities among the customers based on their numerical features.

The other options are not as effective or efficient as the t-SNE approach. Running k-means for different values of k and creating an elbow plot can help determine the optimal number of clusters, but it does not provide a visual representation of the clusters or the customers. Embedding the numerical features using t-SNE and creating a line graph does not make sense, as a line graph is used to show the change of a variable over time, not the distribution of data points in a space. Running k-means for different values of k and creating box plots for each numerical column within each cluster can provide some insights into the statistics of each cluster, but it is very time-consuming and cumbersome to create and compare thousands of box plots. References:

Dimensionality Reduction - Amazon SageMaker

Visualize high dimensional data using t-SNE - Amazon SageMaker

Amazon Comprehend is a natural language processing (NLP) service that uses machine learning to find insights and relationships in text. It can analyze text documents and identify the key topics, entities, sentiments, languages, and more. In this case, Amazon Comprehend can be used with the transcribed files from Amazon Transcribe to extract the main topics that are being discussed by the call operators. This can help to understand the common issues and concerns of the customers, and provide insights for further analysis and improvement. References:

Amazon Comprehend - Amazon Web Services

AWS Certified Machine Learning - Specialty Sample Questions

In Amazon SageMaker, hyperparameter tuning jobs optimize model performance by adjusting hyperparameters. Amazon SageMaker’s hyperparameter tuning supports completion criteria settings that enable efficient management of tuning resources. In this scenario, the ML specialist aims to set a completion criterion that will terminate the tuning job as soon as SageMaker detects that further improvements in the objective metric are unlikely to exceed 1%.

The CompleteOnConvergence setting is designed for such requirements. This criterion enables the tuning job to automatically stop when SageMaker determines that additional hyperparameter evaluations are unlikely to improve the objective metric beyond a certain threshold, allowing for efficient tuning completion. The convergence process relies on an internal optimization algorithm that continuously evaluates the objective metric during tuning and stops when performance stabilizes without further improvement.

This is supported by AWS documentation, which explains that CompleteOnConvergence is an efficient way to manage tuning by stopping unnecessary evaluations once the model performance stabilizes within the specified threshold.