Client has provided sample flies of their data from the following data sources:
Google Campaign Manager
Below are the requirements from the client and additional information:
• The sources are linked to each other by shared Media Buy names.
• In addition-to the mutual Media Buys, the sources contain campaign and site values. However, the client would like to see the campaign/site values coming from Google CM and not from Google DV360.
• The source of truth for cost is Google DV360.
As a first step, a Parent-Child relationship was created between the two files, and the following mapping was performed, within both data streams:
Please note:
• All other measurements were mapped as well to the appropriate fields.
• No other mapping manipulations or formulas were implemented.
How many records will the merged table hold?
A technical architect is provided with the logic and Opportunity file shown below:
The opportunity status logic is as follows:
For the opportunity stages “Interest”, “Confirmed Interest” and “Registered”, the status should be “Open”.
For the opportunity stage “Closed”, the opportunity status should be closed
Otherwise, return null for the opportunity status
Given the above file and logic and assuming that the file is mapped in a GENERIC data stream type with the following mapping:
“Day” — Standard “Day” field
“Opportunity Key” > Main Generic Entity Key
“Opportunity Stage” — Generic Entity Key 2
“Opportunity Count” — Generic Custom Metric
A pivot table was created to present the count of opportunities in each stage. The pivot table is filtered on January (entire month). What is the number of opportunities in the Interest stage?
Your client is interested in ingesting the below file:
The client decided to upload the file to a new generic data stream type and map ‘Date’ to ‘Day’ and ‘Number of Topics’ to a generic custom metric.
In regards to the fields ‘Meeting Code’ and ‘Meeting Name’, your client is debating several options.
Which two options would you recommend in order to avoid data loss?
An implementation engineer is requested to extract the second position
of the Campaign Name values.
The Campaign values consist of multiple delimiter types, as can be
seen in the following example:
Campaign Name: Ad15X2w&Delux_wal90
Desired value: Delux
Which three harmonization methods will achieve the desired outcome?
Your client has provided sample files of their data from the following data sources:
Google Campaign Manager
Below are the requirements from the client and additional information:
* The sources are linked to each other by shared Media Buy names.
* In addition to the mutual Media Buys, the sources contain campaign and site values. However, the client would like to see the campaign/site values coming from Google CM and not from Google DV360.
* The source of truth for cost is Google DV360
Which action(s) are needed to take place in order to meet the client’s requirement and set Google DV360 as the source of truth for Cost?
A client wants to integrate their data within Marketing Cloud Intelligence to optimize their marketing Insights and cross-channel marketing activity analysis. Below are details regarding the different data sources and the number of data streams required for each source.
Which three advantages does a client gain from using Calculated Dimensions as the harmonization method for creating the Objective field?
The following file was uploaded into Marketing Cloud Intelligence as a generic dataset type:
The mapping is as follows:
Day — Day
Web_site_source — Main Generic Entity Attribute 01
Page Views — Generic Metric 1
*Note that ‘web_site_key’ and ‘web_site_name’ are NOT mapped.
How many rows will be stored in Marketing Cloud Intelligence after the above file is ingested?
A technical architect is provided with the logic and Opportunity file shown below:
The opportunity status logic is as follows:
For the opportunity stages “Interest”, “Confirmed Interest” and “Registered”, the status should be “Open”.
For the opportunity stage “Closed”, the opportunity status should be closed Otherwise, return null for the opportunity status.
Given the above file and logic and assume that the file is mapped in the OPPORTUNITIES Data Stream type with the following mapping:
“Day” — “Created Date”
“Opportunity Key” + Opportunity Key
“Opportunity Stage” — Opportunity Stage
A pivot table was created to present the count of opportunities in each stage. The pivot table is filtered on Jan 11th. What is the number of ‘opportunities in the Confirmed Interest stage?
An implementation engineer is requested to create the harmonization field - Magician
This field should come from multiple Twitter Ads data streams, and should follow the below logic:
Using the Harmonization Center, the engineer created a single Pattern for Campaign Name. What other action should the engineer take to meet the requirements?
An implementation engineer has been provided with the below dataset:
*Note: CPC = Cost per Click
Formula: Cost / Clicks
Which action should an engineer take to successfully integrate CPC?
An implementation engineer is requested to integrate the following files:
File A:
File B:
The client would like to link the two files in order to view the two KPIS (Tasks Completed’ and ‘tasks Assignmed’) alongside’Employee Name’ and/or ‘Squard’.
A Parent-Child configuration was set between the two.
Which two statements are correct?
An implementation engineer has been asked to perform QA for a standard file ingestion, done by the client.
The source file that was ingested can be seen below:
The number of rows added to this data stream is 3. What could have led to this discrepancy?