ISTQB CT-AI Dumps

Object recognition issues in test automation often arise whendevelopers frequently change object identifiersin the GUI. AI can enhance the stability of GUI automation by:

Using multiple criteria for object identification

AI cantrack UI elements using multiple attributessuch asXPath, label, ID, class, and screen coordinatesrather than relying on a single identifier that may change over time.

This approach makes the automationless brittle and more adaptive to changes in the UI​.

Why other options are incorrect?

B (Ignore unrecognizable objects to avoid failures): Ignoring objects instead of identifying them properly wouldlead to incomplete or incorrect test execution.

C (Dynamically name objects and alter source code): AI-based testing tools donot modify application source code; they work byadjusting the recognition strategy.

D (Anticipate developer changes and pre-alter automation code): While AI can adapt,it does not predict future changes to the GUI, making this option unrealistic​.

Thus,Option A is the best answer, as AI tools enhance object recognitionby dynamically selecting the most stable and persistent identification methods, improving test automation reliability.

Certified Tester AI Testing Study Guide References:

ISTQB CT-AI Syllabus v1.0, Section 11.6.1 (Using AI to Test Through the Graphical User Interface (GUI))

ISTQB CT-AI Syllabus v1.0, Section 11.6.2 (Using AI to Test the GUI)​.

 Factors Affecting ML Functional Performance:The data pipeline, quality of the labeling, and biased data are all factors that significantly affect the performance of machine learning models. The number of classes, while relevant for the model structure, is not a direct factor affecting the performance metrics such as accuracy or bias.

 Reference:ISTQB_CT-AI_Syllabus_v1.0, Sections on Data Quality and its Effect on the ML Model and ML Functional Performance Metrics​​​​.

To calculate the accuracy, recall, and specificity from the confusion matrix provided, we use the following formulas:

Confusion Matrix:

Actually Rotten: 45 (True Positive), 8 (False Positive)

Actually Fresh: 5 (False Negative), 42 (True Negative)

Accuracy:

Accuracy is the proportion of true results (both true positives and true negatives) in the total population.

Formula: Accuracy=TP+TNTP+TN+FP+FN\text{Accuracy} = \frac{TP + TN}{TP + TN + FP + FN}Accuracy=TP+TN+FP+FNTP+TN​

Calculation: Accuracy=45+4245+42+8+5=87100=0.87\text{Accuracy} = \frac{45 + 42}{45 + 42 + 8 + 5} = \frac{87}{100} = 0.87Accuracy=45+42+8+545+42​=10087​=0.87

Recall (Sensitivity):

Recall is the proportion of true positive results in the total actual positives.

Formula: Recall=TPTP+FN\text{Recall} = \frac{TP}{TP + FN}Recall=TP+FNTP​

Calculation: Recall=4545+5=4550=0.9\text{Recall} = \frac{45}{45 + 5} = \frac{45}{50} = 0.9Recall=45+545​=5045​=0.9

Specificity:

Specificity is the proportion of true negative results in the total actual negatives.

Formula: Specificity=TNTN+FP\text{Specificity} = \frac{TN}{TN + FP}Specificity=TN+FPTN​

Calculation: Specificity=4242+8=4250=0.84\text{Specificity} = \frac{42}{42 + 8} = \frac{42}{50} = 0.84Specificity=42+842​=5042​=0.84

Therefore, the correct combinations of accuracy, recall, and specificity are 0.87, 0.9, and 0.84 respectively.

References:

ISTQB CT-AI Syllabus, Section 5.1, Confusion Matrix, provides detailed formulas and explanations for calculating various metrics including accuracy, recall, and specificity.

"ML Functional Performance Metrics" (ISTQB CT-AI Syllabus, Section 5).