Oracle 1z0-1046-24 Dumps

Full Detailed In-Depth Explanation:

In Oracle Global Human Resources Cloud, BPM Worklist manages approval workflows. A request reappearing after approval suggests a change in its routing.

Option A: Correct. A pushback from the second-level approver returns the request to prior approvers (e.g., you), causing it to reappear.

Option B: Incorrect. Rejection typically closes the request or routes it differently, not back to you unless configured unusually.

Option C: Incorrect. Approval moves it forward or completes it, not back to your worklist.

Option D: Correct. An ad hoc route (inserting additional approvers) could loop it back to you ifyou’re included again.

Option E: Correct. Reassignment to you by the second-level approver would place it back in your worklist.

The correct answers are A, D, and E, per "Using Global Human Resources" on approval workflows.

Full Detailed In-Depth Explanation:

Checklists in Oracle Global Human Resources Cloud can be assigned to workers before their official hire date, typically during onboarding. The "Using Global Human Resources" guide under "Checklists and Onboarding" explains that for a worker to access and complete checklist tasks prior to their hire date, they must be added as a Pending Worker. A Pending Worker record requires an effective date (start date of the record) that is equal to or earlier than the current system date, allowing system access, and a future hire date (when they transition to an Employee). This setup enables pre-hire tasks, such as completing forms, to be actioned. Option A (applicant in Recruiting Cloud) doesn’t grant HCM access, and Option B (Employee with future hire date) doesn’t allow pre-hire task completion before the hire date is effective. Option C is precise and correct.

Full Detailed In-Depth Explanation:

In Oracle Global Human Resources Cloud, enterprise structures like LDGs, divisions, legal employers, and PSUs are configured based on legislative, operational, and payroll needs.

LDGs: One per country (UK, US, Saudi Arabia, UAE, India) due to distinct legislative requirements (e.g., labor laws, tax rules), totaling 5.

Divisions: Operationally, the company can group Saudi Arabia and UAE into one division due to their small size, alongside UK, US, and India, totaling 4 divisions.

Legal Employers: Each country typically requires a legal employer for employees (UK, US, Saudi Arabia, UAE). India’s contingent workers still require a legal employer for compliance, totaling 5.

PSUs: Payroll Statutory Units are needed for payroll processing. India’s contingent workers may not require a PSU if payroll is not processed (common for contingent workers), so 4 PSUs (UK, US, Saudi Arabia, UAE).

Option A: Incorrect; combining Saudi Arabia and UAE into one LDG ignores separate legislative needs.

Option B: Incorrect; only 2 legal employers and PSUs overlook small offices’ compliance needs.

Option C: Incorrect; 5 PSUs assume India needs payroll, which isn’t typical for contingent workers.

Option D: Correct: 5 LDGs, 4 divisions, 5 legal employers, 4 PSUs.

The correct answer isD, per "Implementing Global Human Resources" on enterprise structures.